|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
曇鸞・道綽における仏身仏土の思想構造（下）─弥陀浄土説から弥陀主格説へ─=T’an-luan and Daochuo’s Structural Understanding on the Body and the Land of the Buddha (Part Two) |
|
|
|
| Author |
田中無量 (著)=Tanaka, Muryo (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
武蔵野大学仏教文化研究所紀要=Journal of Institute of Buddhist Culture, Musashino University=ムサシノ ダイガク ブッキョウ ブンカ ケンキュウジョ キヨウ
|
|---|
| Volume | n.33 |
|---|
| Date | 2017.02.24 |
|---|
| Pages | 25 - 47 |
|---|
| Publisher | 武蔵野大学仏教文化研究所 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.musashino-u.ac.jp/bukken/
|
|---|
| Location | 西東京市, 日本 [Nishitokyo-shi, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | 願生往生=Ganshō Ōjō; 弥陀身土=AMIDA’s Shindo; 三身三土=Sanshinn Sando; 救済論=Kyusai-ron; 修道論=Shūdō-ron |
|---|
| Abstract | In this paper, I have will discuss and clarify the differences found in the basic understanding between Tʼan-luan and aochuo with regard to the teachings on the Budda-body and the Buddha-land. With regard to these teachings, Tʼan-luan discussed “Amidaʼs Pure Land” from the perspective of the Bodhisattvas and “those aspiring to be born” from the perspective of their being embraced in the Great Compassion of Amida’s Pure Land. On the other hand, Daochuo discussed them from the perspective of Amitābhaʼs Buddha, thereby revealing the principles of practices involved with oneʼs “birth in the pure land”（Ōjō Jōdo）．These differences mean that T’an-luan revealed teachings for the Pure Land aspirants who are already embraced in Amitābhaʼs great compassion, while Daochuo revealed teachings for the Pure Land aspirants who are not yet embraced by Amitābhaʼs great compassion.
|
|---|
| Table of contents | 序論 26
一. 曇鸞・道綽における二種法身説・広略相入論の相違 30
二. 道綽の菩提心論にみる三身三土義 33
三. 曇鸞と道綽における「見生の火」理解の相違と道綽の「始終」の説示 38
結論 43 |
|---|
| ISSN | 18820107 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 450 |
|---|
| Created date | 2017.08.04 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2018.02.27 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
