|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
What the Cārvākas Originally Meant |
|
|
|
Author |
Bhattacharya, Ramkrishna (著)
|
Source |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
Volume | v.38 n.6 |
Date | 2010.12 |
Pages | 529 - 542 |
Publisher | Springer |
Publisher Url |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
Location | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 英文=English |
Keyword | Sanskrit philosophical literature; Commentaries; Reconstruction; Interpretation; Development; Inconsistency |
Abstract | This essay proposes to review the problems of reconstructing and interpreting ancient texts, particularly philosophical commentaries, in the context of the Cārvāka/Lokāyata system of India. Following an overview of the Indian philosophical text tradition and the ontological and epistemological positions of the Cārvākas, three cases are discussed: (1) when there is no invariance in the text and the commentary, (2) when commentators differ among themselves in their interpretations, and (3) when contradictory interpretations are offered. The paper further discusses why certain commentaries are to be treated as inconsistent with the base text and concludes that innovations inconsistent with the intention of the author should be treated differently from glosses that seek to explain the author's original intentions. |
Table of contents | Reconstructing and Interpreting Ancient Texts: Two Views 529 The Indian Philosophical Tradition: An Overview 531 The Ontology and Epistemology of the Carvaka/Lokayata 532 Commentaries on the Carvakasutra 533 Invariance in Intention and Interpretation 533 When Commentators Differ 536 The Carvaka View on Inference in the SDS 537 Contradictory Interpretations Offered by Commentators 537 Conclusion 539 |
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10781-010-9103-y |
Hits | 97 |
Created date | 2019.10.09 |
Modified date | 2023.10.18 |

|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|