|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
《與神同行―罪與罰》中《佛說壽生經》與佛教《金剛經》的德福觀之對比研究=A Comparative Study about the Conception of Virtue-Happiness between Buddha Speaks the Life and Repaying Sutra and The Diamond of Perfect Wisdom Sutra |
|
|
|
| Author |
陳鳳娥 (著)=Chen, Feng-er (au.)
|
|---|
| Date | 2019 |
|---|
| Pages | 121 |
|---|
| Publisher | 華梵大學 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://www.hfu.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 博碩士論文=Thesis and Dissertation |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Degree | master |
|---|
| Institution | 華梵大學 |
|---|
| Department | 哲學系碩士班 |
|---|
| Advisor | 林永崇 |
|---|
| Publication year | 107 |
|---|
| Keyword | 與神同行─罪與罰=Along with the Gods: The Two Worlds; 佛說壽生經=The Life and Repaying Sutra; 金剛經=The Diamond Sutra; 德行=Virtue; 幸福=Happiness; 因果業報=karma-reward |
|---|
| Abstract | 韓國電影《與神同行─罪與罰》以《佛說壽生經》作為開場，展開主角接受陰間地獄審判的故事，傳達出「好人好報」的「德福一致」觀念，但影片受廣大迴響後卻引發《佛說壽生經》非佛說的疑義，於是筆者以漢傳佛教的《金剛經》為例，試圖比較兩部經典德福觀的異同。
本文首先就哲學相關文獻整理出「德」與「福」二字之起源與內涵，再梳理哲學家對於德福關係的不同主張。接著，分析統整《佛說壽生經》與《金剛經》中的善行、修行法門和所得之福德、功德，歸納出《佛說壽生經》強調交納燒折壽生錢、看注持誦《壽生經》可解消罪業、獲得福報，呈現出「現世果報」的有漏德福觀；《金剛經》教導眾生欲成就涅槃之最高理想，要發菩提心，以一切菩薩行，實踐自利利他之工夫，且「不住於心」，筆者稱之為「究竟彼岸」的無漏德福觀。在釐清兩者德福關係的核心觀念後，於第伍章進行兩者德福觀之分析比對。
最後筆者發現，兩經的德福觀差異性多於共通點。其間的共通點有二：均立基於因果業報理論、均提及受持讀誦經文的修行法門，惟其所得福德有所差別；差異性則在於《金剛經》較重視「心識的作用」以及布施行證的實踐；另外，《佛說壽生經》追求現世的福德與轉世的福報，而《金剛經》不執著於世間福德，徹底解消福德之糾結。
The Korean film Along with the Gods: The Two Worlds starts with the prelude as The Life and Repaying Sutra that unfolds the story as the protagonist accepts the trial from the hell of Hades, sending the message of ‘Reward for Good Man’ with the notion of ‘Consistency of Virtue and Happiness’. Nevertheless, after the film has triggered significant feedbacks from many viewers, it has, then, initiated the doubt if The Life and Repaying Sutra is Buddhist or not. As such, the author has based on The Diamond of Perfect Wisdom Sutra of Chinese Buddhism as an example as he attempts to compare the similarities and differences regarding the concepts of virtue and happiness in these two classics.
First, this paper has categorized and re-organized the origin and connotation of the two words ‘virtue’ and ‘happiness’ from related literatures of philosophy; afterwards, it has reviewed diverse opinions on the relationship between virtue and happiness by different philosophers. Afterwards, it analyzes good deeds, Buddhist practices, merit and punya from The Life and Repaying Sutra and The Diamond of Perfect Wisdom Sutra. As a recapitulation, The Life and Repaying Sutra emphasizes paying by burning bills for the Life as well as Repaying, so that one can absolve reparation by watching the abbot chanting The Life and Repaying Sutra and then obtain rewards of blessing rewards, a demonstration with the concept of sasrava merit for ‘Karma-reward’ in this life. The Diamond of Perfect Wisdom Sutra teaches all beings for achieving the highest ideal of Nirvana (disambiguation) as one expresses Bodhicitta, does all Buddha, and practices self-cherishing and altruism, hence ‘Not Caged by The Heart’. The author calls ‘Six perfections’ as the concept of non-sasrava merit. When the author clarifies the core concepts of the relationship between virtue and happiness, he would analyze and correlate the two concepts as virtue and happiness in chapter five.
Finally, the author has discovered the conception of virtue-happiness among these two sutras is more different than their commonality. Their commonalities can be found in two areas: both are justified in terms of the theory of causality, and mention about the abbot practicing the scriptures, while the rewards of their virtue-happiness are found with difference as The Diamond of Perfect Wisdom Sutra pays more attention to ‘the function of citta’ and the practice of offering evidence; on the other hand, The Life and Repaying Sutra pursues blessings from present virtue-happiness and reincarnation. In addition, The Diamond of Perfect Wisdom Sutra is not obsessed with the virtue-happiness of the present world, wholly freed from the entanglement of virtue-happiness. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 誌謝 I
摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與研究目的 2
第二節 文獻探討 4
一、金容華，《與神同行─罪與罰》相關之文獻 4
二、《佛說壽生經》相關之文獻 7
三、《金剛經》相關之文獻 9
四、德福觀相關之文獻 11
第三節 研究方法 14
一、文獻資料分析法 14
二、詮釋學方法 15
三、比較哲學 16
第四節 章節概要 18
第貳章 德福關係的基本問題 21
第一節 德之起源與內涵 21
一、德之起源 21
二、德之內涵 24
第二節 福之起源與內涵 28
一、福之起源 28
二、福之內涵 30
第三節 德與福之關聯 34
一、德與福之關聯的幾種類型 36
二、康德的德福觀 39
第參章 《佛說壽生經》的德福觀 45
第一節 紙錢寄庫思想 46
一、紙錢寄庫思想之源流 48
二、佛教對紙錢寄庫的看法 50
第二節 壽生錢 53
一、壽生錢意指為何？ 53
二、壽生錢的作用 56
第三節 功德與福德 59
一、功德與福德之意涵 59
二、功德與福德的不同之處 60
第四節 《佛說壽生經》的德福觀 61
一、《佛說壽生經》中的果報 61
二、「現世果報」之德福觀 63
第肆章 《金剛經》的德福觀 67
第一節 眾生修行之最高理想 67
一、離苦得樂 68
二、無餘涅槃 69
第二節 般若波羅蜜之六度菩薩行 71
一、六度波羅蜜 72
二、布施統攝六度 73
三、法施勝於財施 75
第三節 所做福德，不受福德 76
一、應無所住而布施 76
二、著相是福德，離相是功德 77
三、所做福德，不受福德 79
第四節 「究竟彼岸」的德福觀 80
一、《金剛經》對福德的界定 80
二、破除對福德的執著 82
三、福慧二嚴，達到究竟彼岸 83
第伍章 結論：德福觀之對比 85
第一節 同於因果業報 85
第二節 異於心識作用 88
第三節 異於布施行證 91
第四節 受持讀誦經文的不同 93
第五節 福德的有漏或無漏 96
第六節 結論 98
參考文獻 101
圖表 1 《與神同行─罪與罰》開場畫面 45 |
|---|
| Hits | 444 |
|---|
| Created date | 2020.02.05 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.01.18 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
