|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Ho, Chien-hsing (著)=何建興 (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
Philosophy East and West
|
|---|
| Volume | v.56 n.3 |
|---|
| Date | 2006.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 409 - 427 |
|---|
| Publisher | University of Hawai'i Press |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/
|
|---|
| Location | Honolulu, HI, US [檀香山, 夏威夷州, 美國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 英文=English |
|---|
| Abstract | A number of traditional philosophers and religious thinkers advocated an ineffability thesis to the effect that the ultimate reality cannot be expressed as it truly is by human concepts and words. But this thesis has been criticized consistency of this thesis. After introducing certain criticisms set forth by the critics and examining the disputable solution offered by John Hick, the author attends to Bhartrhari's solution to tackle the main problem here. This fifth-century Indian grammarian-philosopher's strategy, based on the imposition-cum-negation method, is then enlarged and supplemented to deal with the criticisms and related issues. |
|---|
| Table of contents | Prologue 409
The Criticisms 409
Hick’s Solution 411
Bhartṛhari’s Solution 412
Knowing More than We Can Tell 416
Responses to the Criticisms 418
Absolute Ineffability 420
Epilogue 421
Notes 423 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00318221; 15291898 |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1353/pew.2006.0037 |
|---|
| Hits | 302 |
|---|
| Created date | 2020.09.10 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2020.09.10 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
