|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
불교 수행론과 젠더문제=The Theory of Buddhist Practice And Gender Issues |
|
|
|
| Author |
조승미 (著)=Cho, Seung-mee (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.8 |
|---|
| Date | 2004.06 |
|---|
| Pages | 83 - 122 |
|---|
| Publisher | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.kabs.re.kr/
|
|---|
| Location | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 韓文=Korean |
|---|
| Keyword | 불교수행론=The Theory of Buddhist Practice; 젠더문제=Gender Issues; 여성주의 불교=Feminist Buddhism; 반야=Prajñā; 방편=Upāya; 보살수행=Boddhisattva's Practice; 남성중심주의=Androcentrism; 계보=lineage; 선불교=Zen buddhism; 이원성=Dualism |
|---|
| Abstract | The basic problem of theoretical dispute among the contemporary feminists is whether the femininity different from maleness exists as nature or not. Some feminists argue that woman equals man, so feminity is not exist. But others criticize that opinion, and say that because woman are different from man distinctly, the liberation of woman means that the world of woman is separated from that of man.
In reference to this controversy, I present the view of woman based on the prajñā and the upāya which are in pairs of the Mahāyāna thought.
According to the sight of prajñā, there is no substance in woman. And according to the vision of upāya, the characteristic experience of woman will be the meanings of way that save women. In addition, the bodhisattva's practice will keep balance of these two sights.
I interpret gender trouble as suffering in the Four Noble Truths of Buddhism. So feminism represents the fourth Noble Truth, namely the path, and is defined as the bodhisattva's practice of the recent times in this paper.
In the third chapter, I investigate the theory of Buddhist practice with feminists point of view. In the first place, the discourse on woman's practice is analyzed critically.
The dualism in the doctrine of buddhist practice reveals another obstacle to solve gender issues through the buddhist practice. The doctrine includes dualistic composition, that is, feelings/wisdom, body/mind, statement/silence. Moreover, these elements constitute the hierarchical frame.
Zen buddhism is appreciated that has dissolved the established discourse of buddhist practice. Therefore, we can find the possibility of breaking down the conventional notion from the tradition of zen buddhism. But, in spite of usefulness like this, because zen buddhism has formed androcentric lineage, this problem remains to be solved for feminist buddhism.
Feelings, body, and statement are thought to play important roles in the practice of feminist buddhism which aims to solve the suffering of suppressed women, but we must not allow the idea that these elements belong to the female nature.
Nevertheless, it is expected that new discourse contains these elements will transform the current theories of buddhist practice considerably. |
|---|
| Table of contents | I. 서언 83
II. 젠더문제에 대한 불교적 해석 86
1. ‘여성’에 대한 통찰 86
2. 젠더문제와 사성제 89
3. 여성주의와 보살수행 92
III. 젠더의 관점에서 본 불교수행론 95
1. 여성수행 담론의 문제점 95
1) 여성/여성임에 대한 혐오를 가르친다. 95
2) 여성의 성취는 남성이 된 것으로 표현된다. 97
3) 여성적 역할론, 모성 찬미론의 억압성 100
2. 이원적 수행원리의 위계 구조 103
1) 감정 혹은 감정체험의 배제 104
2) 마음의 원리에 통합된 몸의 소외성 107
3) 진리에 도달할 수 없는 언어의 제약성 109
3. 젠더 - 이원적 수행원리의 관계 이해 113
4. 이원적 수행론의 해체 가능성과 한계점 - 선불교 전통 115
IV. 결어 118
|
|---|
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 58 |
|---|
| Created date | 2021.04.09 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2021.04.09 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
