|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
『華嚴宗一乘開心論』의 사상적 특질=A Philosophical Characteristic of Kegonshu-ichijo-kaishin-ron |
|
|
|
| Author |
金天鶴 (著)=김천학 (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.17 |
|---|
| Date | 2007.08 |
|---|
| Pages | 55 - 81 |
|---|
| Publisher | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.kabs.re.kr/
|
|---|
| Location | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 韓文=Korean |
|---|
| Keyword | 화엄종일승개심론=Kegonshu-ichijo-kaishin-rom; 석마하연론=shi-moheyan-lun; 헤이안시대=The Heian Period; 보기=Fuki; 장세=Chosai; 공해=Kukai; 법장=Fa-tsang; 혜원=Hui-yuen; 인명=Buddhist logic; 해인삼매=the Buddhavatamsaka-samadhi |
|---|
| Abstract | It is not easy to grasp the contents of the thought of Kaishin-ron completely, because only one volume exists in six volumes. There is no certain record to prove that Kaishin-ronwas written by Imperial command, but it is estimated that Kaishin-ronis Imperial compilation and the author Fuki is a pupil of Cho-sai of Todaiji-temple from examination of the text. The philosophical characteristics of Kaishin-ron are summarized as follows.
First, Fuki recognized logic as a required means to understand the teachings of Buddha. By using logic, he proved that all beings are included in the Buddhavatamsaka-samadhi and the doctrine of the Hua-yan Sutra surpasses others. In addition, criticizing peoples of the one vehicle who disregard logic, he emphasized the importance of logic.
Second, in Kaishin-ron , Fa-tsang's Tanxuan-ji and Hui-yuen's Gan-ding ji are occupied the important position and there are overwhelmingly many quotations from this two writings. It means that Kaishin-ronmakes a flow of japanese huayan studies since the Nara period.
In addition, we can find that the author of Kaishin-ronrespects shingon-buddhism and quotes books of the shingon buddhist system by influence of Kukai. It shows that Kaishin-ronhas rather different characteristics from Kegon-shiki (華厳私記類) of the Heian period. |
|---|
| Table of contents | I. 들어가는 글 55
II. 문헌의 기초적 검토 57
1. 서지와 찬술 년대 57
2. 인용문헌으로 본 사상의 경향 64
III. 화엄사상의 특질 66
1. 해인삼매의 선양 66
2. 어리석은 자[有迷者] 에 대한 비판의 의미 69
3. 『석마하연론』 인용의 의미 71
1) 『석마하연론』 인용개소의 분석 71
2) 원원해와 비로자나불의 관계 76
IV. 결론 77 |
|---|
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 157 |
|---|
| Created date | 2021.04.28 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2021.04.28 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
