Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsMuseumLinks

Extra service
pūrvācārya(先代 軌範師) 再考=Pūrvācārya Revisited
Author 권오민 (著)=Kwon, Oh-min (au.)
Source 불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
Pages243 - 287
Publisher Url
LocationDaegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Keyword先代 規範師=pūrvācārya; 經量部=Sautrāntika; 瑜珈行派=Yogācāra; 袴谷憲宗=Hakamaya Noriaki; 原田和宗=Harada Waso; 『순정리론』=Nyāyānusārā śāstra; 種子說=Theory of bīja; 色心互熏說=anyonyabījaka
Abstract As suggested in the title, this thesis aimed to critically examine Hakamaya Noriaki’s Pūrvācārya kō(考)(Indogaku Bukkyōaku kenkyū 34-2), but was really written as a part of the criticism of the discussion developed by Harada Wasō that was adopting it as one of the primary grounds for his own hypothesis about the origin of Sautrāntika(“in fact it is a fictitious sect as Yogācāra").
Hakamaya said that his thesis was but a working hypothesis for confirming the assumption that “pūrvācārya on Abhidharmakośabhāṣya belongs to Yogācāra.”
Furthermore, he was only interested in the traces on Yogācāra literature, and did not consider its ideal origin or relevance. In the opinion of the writer, his thesis raised a question significantly, but did not present any grounds for settling that all pūrvācāryas in 11 places were the masters of Yogācāra, or Asaṅga. Pūrvācāyas can be the master who has succeeded to teaching or can be a general name. The same is also applied to ācārya.
However, it is difficult to conclude that a master's doctrine belongs to Yogācāra even though it is traced in the Yogācārabhūmi . It is because Sthavira Śrīlāta also asserted a similar doctrine to it.
It is, therefore, a mere conjecture or delusion(?) to literally trace the pūrvācāryas and specify that they belong to Yogācāra. Also, it is nothing but taking the dogmatic attitude to say based on the thesis that “the fact that pūrvācārya belongs to Yogācāra has become a generally accepted idea in the academic circles”.
Table of contentsI. 들어가는 말 243
II. 原田和宗의 가설과 先代軌範師 245
III. 袴谷憲昭의 「pūrvācārya考」 251
1. 궤범사 先代 궤범사 251
2. 「Pūrvācārya考」 254
3. 「Pūrvācārya考」의 비판적 검토 261
IV. 결어 279
ISSN15980642 (P)
Created date2021.05.06
Modified date2021.05.06

Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE


You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse