Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
『화엄십현의사기』에 인용된 신라화엄 문헌의 사상사적 의의=The Doctrinal and Historical Significance of Silla Texts Quoted in the Kegonjugengi-shiki (華嚴十玄義私記, A Personal Commentary on the Ten Profound Meanings of the Huayan Sutra)
Author 김천학 (著)=Kim, Cheon-hak (au.)
Source 불교학리뷰=Critical review for Buddhist studies =仏教学レビュー
Volumev.7
Date2010.06
Pages129 - 151
Publisher金剛大學
Publisher Url https://www.ggu.ac.kr/
LocationKorea [韓國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language韓文=Korean
Note저자정보: 동국대학교 소속
Keyword華嚴十玄義私記; 香象問答; 孔目章; 新羅記; 靑丘記; 見登
AbstractThe tenth century A. D. in the Heian period of Japan is particularly called the age of personal commentaries (私記 shiki in Japanese), in which many writings appear in the name or form of personal commentary from various Buddhist sects, including the Hotso-shu (法相宗).
Among those works, the Kegonjugengi-shiki (華嚴十玄義私記) quotes some phrases from ① the Kojo-mondo (『香象問答』), a kind of transcript of Uisang (義湘)’s lectures, and ② the Sinlagi (『新羅記』) and the Qeongu-gi (『靑丘記』), respectively a commentary of Zhiyan (智儼)’s Kongmuzhang (『孔目章』). The doctrinal importance of these quotations can be found in their being the first quotations of the texts belonging to Uisang tradition ascertained within the texts of the Kegon-shu of Japan. In addition, the Kegonjugengi-shiki is the one extant text evidencing the first quotation of Uisang’s Beopgyedo (『法界圖』). Thus, the Kegonjugengi-shiki is important both in its doctrinal and philological contexts. According to its analysis, it shows familiarity with the texts of Uisang tradition in Silla dynasty, attempting doctrinally to identify Fazang (法藏) and Uisang, which enables us to infer that Gyeondeung (見登), a scholar monk of Silla dynasty, might be found to be responsible for its composition.
Besides, the Kegonjugengi-shiki quotes various texts of Chinese Huayan thought that have not been reported to exist in the form of manuscript in the Nara period, including the Huayanyichengshixuanmen (『華嚴一乘十玄門』) and the Fajieguanmen (『法界觀門) attributed both to Dushun (杜順) and the Fajieyihaibaiwen (『法界義海百問』) and the Huayanzhang (『華嚴章』) attributed both to Fazang (法藏). We should give further attention to the circulation of these texts in order to analyze historically the various doctrinal trends in the manuscript of the Kegonjugengi-shiki.

Table of contents1. 문제의 소재 129
2. 『화엄십현의사기』의 서지적 검토 130
3. 신라문헌 인용의 의의 131
4. 결론 151


ISSN19752660 (P)
DOI10.29213/crbs..7.201006.129
Hits153
Created date2021.08.02
Modified date2021.08.13



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
620643

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse