Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks

Extra service
對牟宗三佛學詮釋基本立場的反思=Reflection on the Basic Standpoint of Mou Zong San's Buddhist Interpretation
Author 杜保瑞 =Duh, Bau-ruei
Source 哲學與文化=Monthly Review of Philosophy and Culture
Volumev.46 n.3
Pages3 - 17
Publisher Url
Location臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Keyword牟宗三=Mou Zong San; 天臺宗=Tiantai Sect; 華嚴宗=Huayan Sect; 康德=Kant; 海德格=Heidegger

The study of modern Asian Buddhism should be based on the study of Buddhist academia. However, in the field of Chinese philosophy, Buddhism is also a branch of Chinese philosophy, so it is necessary to discuss the study of Buddhism in the field of Chinese philosophy. The most profound study of Buddhism in Chinese philosophy circles is Mr. Mou Zong San. However, he constructed the philosophy system of neo-Confucianism by using the concepts of Kant philosophy and Heidegger philosophy, and at the same time, sacrificed the correct connotation of Buddhist theory. Mou Zong San compared the views of Tiantai sect and Huayan sect, and elevated the content of Tiantai sect, which focuses on practical philosophy, into a theory of completeness. As for the completeness of Buddhist theory, it appeals to the preservation of the world of sentient beings. Therefore, Huayan sect philosophy is only a partial philosophy rather than a perfect one. These viewpoints all violate the basic content of Buddhism. He thought he was talking about the problem of philosophical truth, but the result was to create a new system. However, as a practical philosophy of Buddhist theory and its worldview, it is by no means in the definition of the concept and speculative gallop can be discussed under the right and wrong. This article will mainly take the Buddhist part of two books, "phenomenon and thing in itself" and "the intuition of wisdom and Chinese philosophy" as the content explanation and the argument of opinion.
Table of contents壹、前言 3
貳、牟宗三先生哲學活動的型態定位 7
參、牟宗三先生佛學詮釋的型態定位 8
肆、牟先生佛學研究之相關著作 9
伍、《智的直覺與中國哲學》中的佛學討論 10
陸、《現象與物自身》中的佛學討論 12
柒、小結 15
ISSN10158383 (P); 10158383 (E)
Created date2021.08.03
Modified date2021.08.03

Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE


You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse