Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsMuseumLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
学処解説の違いから見た有部系律蔵の系統分類=A Systematic Classification of the Vinayas Belonging to the Sarvāstivādins Based on the Differences in the Commentary to the Śikṣāpada
Author 佐々木閑 =ササキ, シズカ
Source 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
Volumev.65 n.2 (總號=n.141)
Date2017.03.20
Pages809 - 802
Publisher日本印度学仏教学会
Publisher Url http://www.jaibs.jp/
Location東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
Note花園大学教授,文博
Keyword「根本説一切有部律」; 『十誦律』; アビダルマ; 『俱舎論』; 律儀; 波羅夷
AbstractIt seems to be strange that two different Vinayas, the Shisong lü 十誦律, Ten Recitation Vihana, and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya, are extant but belong to the same sect, the Sarvāstivādins. The issue of how we should place them in the historical development of the Sarvāstivādins is particularly meaningful with respect to the investigation of the history of Buddhism, but no clear result has so far been found because of a lack of information; we have only some vague traditions.

In this article, the author presents information which clearly shows that the Shisong lü and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya were related with the Kāśmīra-vaibhāṣikas and Sautrāntikas respectively.

A passage in the Vinaya is quoted in a dispute between the Sautrāntikas and Kāśmīra-vaibhāṣikas described in the Karmanirdeśa of the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya. The corresponding passage can be found in both the Shisong lü and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya and, as a result of a detailed investigation, it turned out that the corresponding passage in the Shisong lü was modified for the purpose of reinforcement of the Kāśmīra-vaibhāṣikas’ claim in the dispute appearing in the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, and the corresponding passage in the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya (Chinese version) was modified to reinforece the claim of the Sautrāntikas.

From this fact, we can establish a close relationship between the Shisong lü and Kāśmīra-vaibhāṣikas, and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya and the Sautrāntikas.
Table of contents1.本稿の目的 809
2.論考の概要 809
3.『俱舎論』「業品」における経部とカシュミール毘婆沙師の論争 809
4.ヤショーミトラ注と漢訳『根本説一切有部毘奈耶』の一致 807
5.『十誦律』の波羅夷第一条語義説明部分 806
6.結論 804
7.問題点(衆賢の『順正理論』について) 804
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOI10.4259/ibk.65.2_809
Hits1
Created date2022.05.11



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
639818

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse