|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
由《沙門果經》與《薄伽梵歌》探討剎帝利之罪惡與救度=The Justification of Killing by Kṣatriya and the Discourse of Soteriology in Samaññaphala sutta and Bhagavad Gītā |
|
|
|
| Author |
吳芬錦 (著)=Wu, Fen-jin (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
正觀雜誌=Satyabhisamaya: A Buddhist Studies Quarterly
|
|---|
| Volume | n.101 |
|---|
| Date | 2022.06.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 45 - 78 |
|---|
| Publisher | 正觀雜誌社 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.tt034.org.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 南投縣, 臺灣 [Nantou hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 作者單位：國立政治大學宗教研究所博士 |
|---|
| Keyword | 《沙門果經》=Samaññaphala sutta; 《薄伽梵歌》=Bhagavad Gītā; 沙門解脫=mokṣa; 敬信=bhakti |
|---|
| Abstract | 本研究將以初期佛教《沙門果經》（Samaññaphala sutta）之阿闍世王（King Ajātaśatru，前？-461）及印度婆羅門傳統《薄伽梵歌》(Bhagavad Gītā)周那(Arjuna)爲主要研究對象，探討早期佛教與印度婆羅門傳統，如何處理剎帝利害生之罪惡與救度？弒父奪權與殺戮戰場的王子，贏得政權卻也面臨內心良知的掙扎與普世價值的譴責，在這兩難的掙扎中，剎帝利該如何處理正法（Dharma）與自法（Sva-dharma）的衝突？如何由沙門解脫（mokṣa）轉向以敬信（Bhakti）爲依歸而得救度？爲何會有這樣的轉變？不同的宗教對於剎帝利的罪惡與救度方式有何不同之處？爲何會有這些差異與改變？本研究試圖完成剎帝利之罪惡與救度之跨宗教比較研究，同樣在印度且年代接近，兩大宗教對「法」與「業」的觀點不同，對於剎帝利之罪，及可能得救度之方式，二者觀點迥異。早期佛教之救度是以沙門解脫爲基調，國王害生之罪會有業與果報，經由認錯懺悔之後，最後仍須出家修行才能得解脫；婆羅門傳統責任爲以行業瑜伽執行種姓義務，沒有執着與慾望的行動不會有果報，最後可以敬信黑天而得救度。
How can the controversial action of killing by Kṣatriya be justified? This study will deal with the conflicts between kingship and ethics, focus on King Ajātaśatru (BCE ? -461) in Samaññaphala sutta and warrior Arjuna in Bhagavad Gītā. To explore the difference between early Buddhism and Brahmanism in terms of justification the killing by Kṣatriya and solving the contradiction between dharma and sva-dharma. How to define karma and how to get salvation? From mokṣa to bhakti, what are the reasons that transform the discourse of religion ethics and soteriology? In this study, I would argue that the diversity interpretation of dharma and karma result in the guilt and salvation are different as well. Ajātaśatru committed patricide would have karma and retribution. After confessing his mistakes and repenting, eventually he had to be a monk and then get liberation. Whereas, Brahman traditions were based on the idea of fulfilling caste obligations, through karma yoga and devotion to Kṛṣṇa to solve the dispute over killings in the war and get salvation by personal God. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一、前言 47
二、政經文化背景與王權觀 48
三、由《沙門果經》探討阿闍世王之罪惡、懺悔與救度 53
四、由《薄伽梵歌》探討剎帝利之罪惡與救度 60
五、剎帝利之罪與救度途徑 67
六、結論 71
七、參考文獻 73 |
|---|
| ISSN | 16099575 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 192 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.07.13 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.08.09 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
