Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
ディグナーガの転義批判=Dignāga’s Criticism of Upacāra
Author 片岡啓 (著)=Kataoka, Kei (au.)
Source 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
Volumev.66 n.1 (總號=n.143)
Date2017.12.20
Pages463 - 457
Publisher日本印度学仏教学会
Publisher Url http://www.jaibs.jp/
Location東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
KeywordDignāga; Pramāṇasamuccaya; apoha; upacāra
AbstractA real entity has many aspects. It can be apprehended with various concepts such as pine, tree, earthen, substance, existent, and object. People can extract a certain aspect of an entity by means of words. According to Dignāga, this extraction is possible only through excluding the other meanings. His claim implies that this extraction is impossible in the framework of realism, in which universals are posited in accordance with their corresponding concepts. According to Dignāga, a co-referential expression sad dravyam cannot be explained in the realist view, because there is a difference in level between the substratum and the property. In other words, the expression would become figurative (aupacārika, bhākta). If one forcedly pulled down the properties to the ground level, undesirable consequences such as contradiction (virodha) between properties or confused perception (mecakadarśana) would follow. It is impossible to extract a single property when many properties cohabit in an entity. The theory of exclusion (apoha), however, does not run into this problem, because exclusion is not a substance (adravya). Many exclusions, such as the exclusion of non-pots and so on, can cohabit in an entity. A certain exclusion can be extracted in accordance with the difference of the excluded objects. Therefore, Dignāga claims that a certain aspect of a real entity is apprehended in the world by excluding the other meanings.
Table of contents1. 序 463
2. 転義の過失の文脈 463
3. 転義の過失の科文 462
4. 転義の不可能 461
5. 多数の属性と一属性の抽出 458
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.1_463
Hits30
Created date2022.07.28
Modified date2022.07.28



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
646312

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse