 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
唯識三性説におけるākāraとbhāvaについて：識転変の〈内〉と〈外〉とをめぐって=The Terms ākāra and bhāva in the Early Yogācāra-vijñaptimātra School |
|
|
|
| Author |
北野新太郎 (著)=Kitano, Shintaro (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
|---|
| Date | 2018.03.20 |
|---|
| Pages | 827 - 822 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | 唯識三性説; AkAra; bhAva; abhUtaparikalpa; vikalpa; 識転変 |
|---|
| Abstract | This paper considers the question of internal and external aspects of vijñānapariṇāma, through analysis of the terms ākāra and bhāva. In the Mahāyānasūtrālaṃkāra XI-19, Maitreya says that ākṛti (=ākāra) exists, but bhāva does not exist (tadākṛtiś ca tatrāsti tadbhāvaś ca na vidyate). This is the basic presupposition in the three-self-natures-doctrine, that there is no conceptualization (upacāra) without its place of dependence (ādhāra). In this case ākāra is the place of dependence of the conceptualization. We should notice that “the place of dependence (ādhāra) of the conceptualization” exists inside of abhūtaparikalpa (vikalpa), but the abhūtaparikalpa falsely envisions the object as “outside itself.” |
|---|
| Table of contents | 0. 問題の所在 827
1. AkAra はあるが，bhAva はない 827
2. AkAra＝見分＝vijJapti 826
3. 識より〈外に〉構想されたものについて 826
4. ヴィカルパと顕現は同じ場所（識転変の内部）にある 825
5. yad vikalpyate は識より〈外に〉構想されている 824
6. 遍計所執性の vijJeya 824 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_827 |
|---|
| Hits | 82 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.08.04 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.08.04 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
