 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
明清耶穌會「補儒絕佛」——以《丙寅（1686年）會課》中的「持齋」問題爲例="Complementing Confucianism and Rejecting Buddhism" by Ming-Qing Jesuits: Research on the Teaching Sessions in 1686; the Question of Fasting |
|
|
|
| Author |
梅謙立 (著)=Meynard, Thierry (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
佛光學報=Fo Guang Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | n.2 新8卷 |
|---|
| Date | 2022.07 |
|---|
| Pages | 41 - 88 |
|---|
| Publisher | 佛光大學佛教研究中心 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://cbs.fgu.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| Location | 宜蘭縣, 臺灣 [I-lan hsien, Taiwan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Keyword | 天主教教育=Catholic education; 人文主義=humanism; 耶穌會=Jesuit; 佛教齋戒=Buddhist fast |
|---|
| Abstract | 最近明清宗教研究從僧侶轉向了民間社會。本文介紹清初南京天主教學校的背景，並且分析是六位天主教學生對佛教齋戒問題所寫的作業。他們的聲音雖然以匿名的形式出現，但是展示了天主教借用儒家經典賴駁斥佛教和民間宗教的齋戒，使儒家經典成爲判分佛教與天主教的持齋問題的最高權威。
Research on religions in the Ming and Qing has recently shifted from clerics to civil society. This paper presents the background of a catholic school in Nanjing at the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, and analyzes the assignments written by 16 students about the Buddhist fast. Their voices are anonymous and yet reveal how Catholicism borrowed from the Confucian classics to denounce the Buddhist fast, giving to the Confucian canon the highest authority to differentiate between the Buddhist and Catholic practice of the fast. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 引論 43
一、南京天主教學校與《丙寅會課》 43
二、《丙寅會課》的儒家人文主義 50
三、「辨持齋」內容的分析 53
（一）直接駁斥佛教齋戒 54
（二）儒家的心齋即天主教的心齋 54
（三）「心齋」和「口齋」兩者的重要性 54
（四）齋戒與時間 56
（五）天主教的素齋的可能 57
四、結論 58 |
|---|
| ISSN | 24143006 (P) |
|---|
| Hits | 195 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.08.09 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.10.25 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
