Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
智顗における十善の受容:維摩経疏と三大部の比較を中心に=Zhiyi’s Concept of the Ten Good Deeds: Comparing the Weimojing shu and the Three Major Commentaries
Author 大津健一 (著)=Otsu, Kenichi (au.)
Source 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
Volumev.67 n.1 (總號=n.146)
Date2018.12.20
Pages303 - 300
Publisher日本印度学仏教学会
Publisher Url http://www.jaibs.jp/
Location東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
Keyword智顗; 十善; 性戒; 維摩経疏; 『摩訶止観』; 『円頓止観』; 『観心論疏』
AbstractZhiyi’s 智顗 Weimojing shu 維摩経疏 and the three major commentaries have different concepts of the ten good deeds. The Weimojing wenshu 維摩経文疏 states that the ten good deeds are the precepts before the ten types of precepts originated from the Da zhidu lun 大智度論. On the other hand, the Mohe zhiguan 摩訶止観 says that the ten good deeds are natural morality, the basis of precepts and the first step of the ten types of precepts. Since three major commentaries were edited by Guanding 灌頂, it is necessary to research their former versions to examine the differences. Both the Yuandun zhiguan 圓頓止観 quoted in Shōshin’s 証真 works and the Zhiguan referred to in Guanding’s Guanxin lunshu 観心論疏 are supposed as the original version of the Mohe zhiguan. In the Yuandun zhiguan, natural morality isn’t included in the ten types of precepts, and their order is also different from that in the current Mohe zhiguan. However, the Guanxin lunshu has the same concept as the current Mohe zhiguan. Therefore, the description about the precepts in the Guanxin lunshu might be different from that of the original Mohe zhiguan. The concept of the ten good deeds in the Weimojing shu doesn’t contradict the Yuandun zhiguan, and that in the three major commentaries would be different from the original. Thus, the characteristic concept of the ten good deeds and natural morality in the three major commentaries might be due to Guanding’s editing.
Table of contents1.はじめに 303
2.維摩経疏と三大部(現行本)における特徴 303
3.『摩訶止観』の諸本 302
4.『円頓止観』 302
5.証真所引の第二本 302
6.『観心論疏』の『止観』 301
7.むすび 300
ISSN00194344 (P); 18840051 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.67.1_303
Hits93
Created date2022.08.11
Modified date2022.08.11



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
647141

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse