Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
チベット仏教における『入中論』6.34の解釈=Two Interpretations of Madhyamakāvatāra 6.34 in Tibet
Author 彭毛才旦 (著)=Pengmao, Caidan (au.)
Source 印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
Volumev.68 n.1 (總號=n.149)
Date2019.12.20
Pages337 - 334
Publisher日本印度学仏教学会
Publisher Url http://www.jaibs.jp/
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language日文=Japanese
Keywordチベット仏教; 『入中論』6.34
AbstractCandrakīrti (ca. 600–650) states in his Madhyamakāvatāra 6.34 to the effect that, if an entity were established by way of its character, emptiness (śūnyatā) would be the cause of destruction of the entity, and that, if so, the conventional reality (saṃvṛti) of such an entity would bear analysis by reasoning. It is evident that Candrakīrti here criticizes another school’s tenets. Who is the target of criticism? There are at least two interpretations in Tibet regarding this question.

Tsong kha pa (1357–1419) and his followers of the Dge lugs pa argue that the Svātantrika school is the target of criticism since it accepts, on the conventional level (tha snyad), the existence of things established by way of their character (rang gi mtshan nyid kyis grub pa). On the other hand, Shākya mchog ldan (1428–1507) and Go rams pa (1429–80), both belonging to the Sa skya pa, reject the Dge lugs pa’s interpretation on the basis of their own understanding of the Madhyamakāvatāra and its autocommentary. They argue instead that the Mind-Only school is the target of criticism here. The underlying idea of the Sa skya pa argument is that there is no ideological difference between the Svātantrika and the Prāsaṅgika.

The present paper discusses the two interpretations of Madhyamakāvatāra 6.34 with special emphasis on the problem of “own character” (rang mtshan), which is discussed in detail in Shākya mchog ldan’s Dbu ma rnam nges.
Table of contents0.問題の所在 337
1.ゲルク派による MA 6.34の解釈 337
2.サキャ派による MA 6.34の解釈 336
3.ゲルク派によるサキャ派への再批判 335
ISSN00194344 (P)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.1_337
Hits42
Created date2022.09.23
Modified date2022.09.23



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
649661

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse