|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
『現観荘厳論』トルポパ註におけるハリバドラ批判=Criticism of Haribhadra in Dol po pa’s Commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra |
|
|
|
| Author |
谷口富士夫 (著)=Taniguchi, Fujio (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.68 n.2 (總號=n.150) |
|---|
| Date | 2020.03.20 |
|---|
| Pages | 906 - 898 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | Abhisamayālaṃkāra; Dol po pa; Haribhadra; gNod ʼjoms |
|---|
| Abstract | Dol po pa’s commentary on the Abhisamayālaṃkāra does not adopt Haribhadra’s interpretation; rather, it often includes quotations from the gNod ’joms (*Ārya-śatasāhasrikāpañcaviṃśatisāhasrikâṣṭādaśasāhasrikāprajñāpāramitā-bṛhaṭṭīkā, attributed variously to Vasubandhu or Daṃṣṭrāsena). However, these quotations are not a commentary on the treatise. Dol po pa criticizes Haribhadra in his commentary for the following reasons. (1) Dol po pa trusts the works of scholars belonging to the Great Madhyamaka, such as Vasubandhu, because they do not contradict the “Maitreya Chapter” in the “Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras.” (2) Dol po pa seems to have attempted to integrate the three gateways and eleven discourses system (sgo gsum rnam grangs bcu gcig) with the eight abhisamaya system. (3) Haribhadra criticizes Vasubandhu, indicating that he interprets the Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras from a mind-only perspective. However, Dol po pa considers Vasubandhu to be a Great Madhyamaka scholar, not just a mind-only one. Therefore, Dol po pa opposes Haribhadra’s interpretation.
In short, Dol po pa emphasizes the “Maitreya Chapter,” which could have been a source of his Other-emptiness theory, and this led to Dol po pa’s emphasis of the gNod ’joms as well as his opposition to Haribhadra’s interpretation. |
|---|
| Table of contents | はじめに 906
1. 『除害論』 905
2. ハリバドラ指名批判 904
（1）『除害論』との関係における批判 904
（2）アーリヤ・ヴィムクティセーナとの比較における批判 902
（3）般若経本文との不一致に関する批判 902
3. 『十万広釈』への言及と三門十一異門説への言及 901
まとめ 900 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.2_906 |
|---|
| Hits | 100 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.09.29 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.09.29 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
