|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
スティラマティにおける「所縁」の二義性について：『唯識三十頌』安慧釈における用例を中心として=The Two Meanings of ālambana in the Triṁśikābhāṣya |
|
|
|
| Author |
北野新太郎 (著)=Kitano, Shintaro (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.68 n.2 (總號=n.150) |
|---|
| Date | 2020.03.20 |
|---|
| Pages | 959 - 954 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | スティラマティ; 所縁の二義性; 形象論の分類; 安慧の一分説 |
|---|
| Abstract | In this paper, I consider two meanings of the term ālambana in Sthiramati’s commentary (Triṁśikābhāṣya=Tbh) on the Triṁśikākārikā. In the beginning of Tbh, Sthiramati says ālambana is imagery “inside” of cognition. From this point of view ālambana means paratantrasvabhāva in the trisvabhāva. On the other hand, in the second half of Tbh, Sthiramati says ālambana is “outside” of cognition, that is parikalpitasvabhāva in the trisvabhāva. The question is whether Sthiramati’s commentary is contradictory. The purpose of this paper is to consider the reason why Sthiramati uses the term ālambana to express two meanings. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 1．問題の所在 959
2．片岡博士による「形象論の分類」について 959
3．スティラマティにおける Alambana の用例について 958
結論 955 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.68.2_959 |
|---|
| Hits | 60 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.09.29 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.09.29 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
