|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
天台智顗における『法華経』と『涅槃経』の関係：吉蔵との比較を含んで=Zhiyi’s Understanding of the Relationship between the Lotus Sūtra and the Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra: Including a Comparison with Jizang’s Understanding |
|
|
|
| Author |
菅野博史 (著)=Kanno, Hiroshi (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
|---|
| Date | 2020.12.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 1 - 11 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | 『法華経』; 『涅槃経』; 仏性; 仏身常住; 法雲; 智顗; 吉蔵 |
|---|
| Abstract | According to the Five-period classification that prevailed during the Northern and Southern Dynasties, the Lotus sūtra does not expound the doctrine of the Buddha-nature or the eternal abiding of the Buddha. In this point the Lotus sūtra was regarded as inferior to the Nirvāṇa sūtra. Zhiyi and Jizang criticize this Five-period classification, arguing instead that the Lotus sūtra, like the Nirvana sūtra, also expounds the doctrine of the Buddha-nature or the eternal abiding of the Buddha. If their argument is to be accepted, why did the Buddha preach the Nirvāṇa sūtra after the Lotus sūtra? This is the problem taken up for consideration by Zhiyi and Jizang. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一 問題の所在 1
二 智顗、吉蔵以前の教判における『法華経』と『涅槃経』の比較 2
三 智顗における『法華経』と仏性——吉蔵との比較を含んで—— 3
四 智顗における『法華経』と仏身常住について——吉蔵との比較を含んで—— 4
五 『涅槃経』の原則的不用論と釈尊の『涅槃経』の説法の理由 6
六 結論 8 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_1 |
|---|
| Hits | 240 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.09.30 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.09.30 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
