|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
『教行信証』における「ヲ」の仮名遣いについて：坂東本の異筆訓点に関する一考察=Orthography of “wo” ヲ in the Kyōgyōshinshō: A Study of Character Readings Written in Different Handwriting in the Bandō Manuscript |
|
|
|
| Author |
青柳英司 (著)=Aoyagi, Eishi (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.69 n.1 (總號=n.152) |
|---|
| Date | 2020.12.25 |
|---|
| Pages | 141 - 146 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | 親鸞; 筆跡; 別筆; 他筆; 付訓; 坂東本 |
|---|
| Abstract | Shinran 親鸞 uses the kana “wo” ヲ in a specific way. First, particular forms such as woka をか,woba をば,womo をも,and woya をやare always written using oka オカ,oha オハ,omo オモ,and oya オヤ.Second, all initial “wo” ヲ at the beginning of readings of characters provided in the text are also transcribed with the kana “o” オ.Virtually all of the Bandō 坂東 text (that is, Shinran’s holographic manuscript) conforms to this convention for the use of wo, but there are a few exceptions. Twelve exceptions to the second rule were found in the Bandō manuscript, primarily in the “Chapter on Practice” (行巻). Moreover, most of these instances are in red ink. Therefore, it is difficult to think that Shinran made a mistake in writing these. Instead, it is quite possible that these instances where written by someone other than Shinran. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 一 問題の所在 141
二 先行研究の整理 142
三 語頭が「ヲ」の単語について 143
四 結びにかえて 145 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.1_141 |
|---|
| Hits | 55 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.10.05 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.10.05 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
