|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| Author |
Kotyk, Jeffrey (著)
|
|---|
| Source |
対法雑誌=Journal of Abhidharma Studies
|
|---|
| Volume | v.2 |
|---|
| Date | 2021 |
|---|
| Pages | 101 - 108 |
|---|
| Publisher | 対法雑誌刊行会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
https://sites.google.com/view/journalofabhidharmastudies
|
|---|
| Location | 神奈川, 日本 [Kanagawa, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | 宿曜経; 宇宙論; 俱舎論; 天文学; 九執暦 |
|---|
| Abstract | Chinese Buddhists adopted Indian cosmology based on Mount Sumeru and the Four Continents, which differed from native Chinese models. The four continents (Jambūdvīpa, Pūrvavideha, Avaragodānīya, and Uttarakuru) are positioned on a flat disc-shaped world. This was a type of flat earth cosmology that was documented in Abhidharma literature. The Buddhist canon does not mention a spherical earth, but Chinese monks were actually aware of an alternative cosmological model based on a spherical earth framework through the Jiuzhi li 九執曆 , a manual of Indian astronomy which was translated by Gautama Siddha in 718. This text introduced into Chinese the first instance of the concept of latitude (Skt. sva-deśa-akṣa). This sort of scientific theory based on a spherical earth model was already known by the mid-Tang. The Xiuyao jing 宿曜經 , compiled by Amoghavajra (705–774) in 759 with a subsequent revision in 764, not only adopts the cosmology outlined in Abhidharma texts, but also cites the Jiuzhi li. The issue at hand is why Amoghavajra and also the astronomer Yixing (673–727) never adopted cosmology based on a spherical earth. The present study will address these points. |
|---|
| Table of contents | はじめに
漢訳アビダルマ文献における宇宙論と「惑星」の問題
『九執暦』の宇宙論
『宿曜経』の宇宙論と『九執暦』
結論
略号一覧
参照文献一覧
一次資料
|
|---|
| ISSN | 24355674 (P); 24355682 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.34501/abhidharmastudies.2.0_101 |
|---|
| Hits | 182 |
|---|
| Created date | 2022.11.18 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2022.11.18 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
