|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
世俗と変壊=Mundaneness and Impermanence |
|
|
|
Author |
木村紫 (著)=Kimura Yukari (au.)
|
Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
Volume | v.69 n.2 (總號=n.153) |
Date | 2021.03.25 |
Pages | 913 - 908 |
Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
Language | 日文=Japanese |
Keyword | 無常; 苦; 道; 諦; 行相; 『勝義空経』 |
Abstract | The Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣā argues on the basis of a sūtra which maintains that something is called mundane (*laukikī) because it changes and perishes. It takes up the question whether the noble path (āryamārga) is mundane so long as it is also conditioned. The noble path is never mundane. But the Abhidharmamahāvibhāṣā only presents the differences between the noble path and mundaneness, and it does not show any reasons for the differences.
The Abhidharmakośabhāṣya cites suffering (duḥkha), the world (loka) and so on as synonyms for appropriative aggregates (upādānaskandha). It defines suffering as follows: suffering is because Āryas have an abhorrence of it, and the world, and suffering is because it perishes (lujyate). The Abhidharmakośabhāṣya argues that all conditioned things are suffering by suffering inherent in conditioning (saṃskāraduḥkhatā). The aspect of impermanent nature draws the aspect of suffering, but the path is not abhorrent to Āryas as it makes them quiet.
The Dharmaskandha, an early Sarvāstivādin text, mentions that the five appropriative aggregates are suffering since perishableness and change are inherent in them. It follows that appropriative aggregates attribute suffering because they are not calm, and against the mind of Āryas. |
Table of contents | 0.はじめに 913 1.『婆沙論』が提起する問―聖道も世俗か― 913 2.『倶舎論』の説く無常と苦 912 3.無常と苦の行相 911 4.『法蘊足論』で説かれる苦諦 911 5.むすび 909 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.69.2_913 |
Hits | 87 |
Created date | 2022.11.26 |
Modified date | 2022.11.26 |
|
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|