|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
敦煌本『壇經』から『曹溪大師傳』へ：八世紀後半の長安における荷澤宗の思想的變遷=From the Dunhuang Version of the Platform Sutra 壇經 （Tanjing） to the Biography of the Great Master of Caoxi 曹溪大師傳 （Caoxi dashi zhuan）: The Ideological Transition of the Heze School 荷澤宗 in Chang’an 長安 in the Late Eighth Century |
|
|
|
| Author |
伊吹敦 (著)=Ibuki, Atsushi (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.70 n.1 (總號=n.155) |
|---|
| Date | 2021.12.20 |
|---|
| Pages | 312 - 305 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | 曹渓大師伝; 敦煌本壇経; 荷沢宗; 慧堅 |
|---|
| Abstract | In the author’s opinion, both the Dunhuang version of the Tanjing （c. 770） and the Biography of the Great Master of Caoxi （781） should be regarded as having been compiled by the school of Huijian 慧堅 （719-792）, who was a disciple of the Heze Shenhui 荷澤神會 （670-762） and was active in Chang’an. Therefore, the differences in Huineng’s 慧能 （638-713） biography in the two documents can be understood as reflecting the ideological changes of the Heze school in Chang’an. From the differences, we can see that the Heze school strengthened their tendency to mediate the conflicts between the Southern school and the Northern school of Chan and defend state Buddhism. We can recognize that the transition was caused by their having taken a position in state Buddhism. |
|---|
| Table of contents | はじめに 312
1．敦煌本『壇經』・ 李舟撰『能大師傳』の成立と『曹溪大師傳』 311
2．「東來二菩薩」についての新見解 310
3．敦煌本『壇經』から『曹溪大師傳』へ 308 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.70.1_312 |
|---|
| Hits | 79 |
|---|
| Created date | 2023.01.05 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.01.05 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
