Site mapAbout usConsultative CommitteeAsk LibrarianContributionCopyrightCitation GuidelineDonationHome        

CatalogAuthor AuthorityGoogle
Search engineFulltextScripturesLanguage LessonsLinks
 


Extra service
Tools
Export
Action, Intention, and Negligence: Manu and Medhātithi on Mental States and Blame
Author Baron, Emily (著) ; Freschi, Elisa (著)
Source Journal of Indian Philosophy
Volumev.51 n.1-2 Fall
Date2023.03
Pages25 - 47
PublisherSpringer
Publisher Url http://www.springer.com/gp/
LocationBerlin, Germany [柏林, 德國]
Content type期刊論文=Journal Article
Language英文=English
NoteEmily Baron & Elisa Freschi, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
KeywordAction; Intention; Blame; Medhātithi; Sanskrit Philosophy; Sanskrit Jurisprudence
AbstractThis paper aims to offer a preliminary explication of the role of and the relation between mental states, action, and blame in Medhātithi’s commentary on the most influential juridical text of the Sanskrit world – the jurisprudential text attributed to Manu. In defining what it means to act and what constitutes engaging in intentional and unintentional action, this paper makes three claims. First, enjoined actions (e.g., sacrifices) require particular mental states to be performed. Notwithstanding the role of mental states in enjoined actions, actions lacking the corresponding mental states can be blameworthy. In fact, unintentional actions (including also actions done intentionally, but under a description that foregoes what renders the conduct sanctionable) can indeed constitute blameworthy conduct. Second, although unintentional action still meets the threshold for constituting blameworthy conduct, mental states generally play an important role regarding the degree of blame assignable to a person. Third, there are several possible rules that make sense of the seemingly inconsistent use and impact of intention throughout Manu’s Code of Laws as Medhātithi’s commentary shows. The paper also sheds light on the relation between intentions and desires according to Medhātithi.
Table of contentsAbstract 25
Introduction: Actions and Intentions 25
Action, Intention, and Blame in Ancient Indian Texts 26
The Early Dharmasūtras and Dharmaśāstras on Mental States and Blame 27
Manu and Medhātithi: Defining Action and Intention 31
Making Sense of Intention, Mistake, and the Consequences of Action in the Mānavadharmaśāstra 38
Conclusion 45
References 46
ISSN00221791 (P); 15730395 (E)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-022-09526-0
Hits47
Created date2023.06.30
Modified date2023.06.30



Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE

Notice

You are leaving our website for The full text resources provided by the above database or electronic journals may not be displayed due to the domain restrictions or fee-charging download problems.

Record correction

Please delete and correct directly in the form below, and click "Apply" at the bottom.
(When receiving your information, we will check and correct the mistake as soon as possible.)

Serial No.
674441

Search History (Only show 10 bibliography limited)
Search Criteria Field Codes
Search CriteriaBrowse