|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
北宋 “文字禪” 出現背景探究 -以禪學與詩學的關系爲中心=Background study of the appearance of the North Song dynasty`s Literary Chan,Centering around the relationship between Chan studies and Poetics |
|
|
|
| Author |
조병활 (著)=Cho, Byung-hwal (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
동아시아불교문화=Journal of Eastern-Asia Buddhism and Culture
|
|---|
| Volume | v.19 n.0 |
|---|
| Date | 2014.09 |
|---|
| Pages | 127 - 159 |
|---|
| Publisher | 동아시아불교문화학회=The Association of Eastern-Asia Buddhism and Culture |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.easternasia.kr/
|
|---|
| Location | Busan, Korea [釜山, 韓國] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| Note | 著者所屬：中央民族大学 |
|---|
| Keyword | 文字禅=Literary Chan; 诗学; 以诗明禅; 不离文字=Not independent from the written words; Poetics; 禅学=Chan studies,; Illuminate Enlightenment with poetry |
|---|
| Abstract | “文字禪”是什마？文字禪這個詞最早出現于何處、何時？本篇論文先考察文字禪壹詞的最早用例幷梳理意見紛운的文字禪的定義，而後以唐、五代禪學和詩學的關系爲中心探索北宋文字禪形成的背景。因禪語與詩語都具有重象征、尊隱喩、不點破等特點，而禪與詩的關系흔密切。在描述方式上，禪與詩的此壹致性推動了“以詩明禪”、“以禪喩詩”的姿態。靈外，詩本來是主觀情緖對客觀世界反應的透露，卽是“人性、感情”的表現。禪也特別重視體味“自性”。這點亦使禪與詩間的距離縮小。禪與詩的這種像似度也是“不立文字”的禪思想漸漸脫離其藩籬，追隨“不離文字”的路線，最終制造文字禪風的內在機理之壹。然而，較多硏究禪學者把不離文字的文字禪的出現視爲禪宗衰落的象征。筆者不同意這個見解。禪師們爲適應時代的要求幷克服當時的困難而努力所制造的産物就是文字禪。可以說“借敎悟宗”與“敎外別傳”、“不立文字”和“不離文字”都是禪師們努力的成果。因此，重視禪詩壹致、不離文字的文字禪的誕生也是禪思想發展的結果。타從來不抛棄或背叛不立文字的精神，反而타爲克服不立文字導致的壹些弊端做了較大的貢獻.
What is “Literary Chan”? When and where did the Literary Chan first appear? This thesis explores the first usage of the word “Literary Chan”, organizes different definitions of the word, and probes the background of the formation of the Literary Chan, centering the relationship between the Poetics and the Chan studies of the Tang and Wudai Dynasties. Chan and Poem are intimatelyrelated, because the Chan Language and the Poetic Language both emphasize symbolism and metaphor. In the way of expression, Chan and Poetics also congruously propelled “Illuminating Enlightenment with poetry” and “Comparing Poetry to Enlightenment.” Additionally, poems are essentially a product which came to existence when subjective emotions and understanding encountered objective matters, which could also be interpreted as a revelation of human nature. Thispoint also reduces the distance between Chan and Poetics. This similarity between Chan and Poetics is also one of the internal reasons behind the gradual separation of the Chan studies from theirown divisions, the pursuit of the way of “Not independent from the written words”, and the ultimate formation of the new trend of the Literary Chan. Although usually there is a tendency to interpret the advent of the Literary Chan, that is “not independent from the written words”, as a mark of Chan Buddhism’s decline, this writer does not agree with this tendency. The Literary Chan is a product of an attempt to meet the requirement of the era and to overcome the impediment of time, made by the Chan monks. One can say that “thanks to the teachings get Buddhist Enlightenment” and “learning the Buddhist thoughts without literary assistance”, “non reliance upon the written words” and “not independent from the written words” are both products of the Chan monks’ diligence. Thus, valuing of the congruence between Chan and Poetics, and the advent of the Literary Chan that is “not independent from the written words” are bothconsequences of the development of the Chan Studies. It never abandoned or contradicted the spirit of “non reliance upon the written words”, and in fact played a dominant role in eliminating the detrimental consequences resulted by “non reliance upon the written words”, if anything. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 1. 文字禅的定义 128
2. 禅学与诗学 -- “僧人与诗，以诗明禅” 134
3. “笔墨佛事，禅诗一致” -- 文字禅出现 150 |
|---|
| ISSN | 27140938 (P); 27140946 (E) |
|---|
| Hits | 30 |
|---|
| Created date | 2023.07.28 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2023.07.28 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
