|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
釈道安の長安移住年次の再考：「比丘大戒序」等に見える木星紀年法の分析を通して=A Reconsideration of the Year of Dao’an’s Relocation to Chang’an: Through the Analysis of the Jovian Year System Used in the Biqiu dajie xu 比丘大戒序 and Other Texts |
|
|
|
| Author |
李尚曄 (著)=Lee, Sangyop (au.)
|
|---|
| Source |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| Volume | v.71 n.2 (總號=n.159) |
|---|
| Date | 2023.03.22 |
|---|
| Pages | 750 - 746 |
|---|
| Publisher | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| Publisher Url |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| Location | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| Content type | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| Language | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| Keyword | 道安; 歳星紀年法; 太歳紀年法; 木星紀年法; 「比丘大戒序」 |
|---|
| Abstract | Dao’an’s 道安 （314-385 CE） relocation to Chang’an is an important historical event that marked the revival of translation activities among Buddhists in early medieval China. Earlier scholars such as Tang Yongtong, Erik Zürcher, and Ui Hakuju assumed that Dao’an’s relocation to Chang’an took place in the year 379. However, this hypothesis does not take into account the Jovian years recorded in the documents produced by Dao’an’s translation team in Chang’an. In this paper, by making use of such resources as the astronomy simulation software Stellarium, I show that the Jovian years recorded in the Dao’an team’s documents match the actual locations of Jupiter of the time, and argue that Dao’an’s relocation to Chang’an must have taken place in 378 rather than in 379. |
|---|
| Table of contents | 1．はじめに 750
2．道安の翻訳チームによる木星紀年法の活用 750
3．終わりに 748
〈参考文献〉 747 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.71.2_750 |
|---|
| Hits | 66 |
|---|
| Created date | 2024.10.25 |
|---|
| Modified date | 2024.10.30 |
|---|
 |
Best viewed with Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac) but not supported IE
|
|
|
