|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jokei and Honen : Debating Buddhist Liberation in Medieval Japan: Then and Now |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Ford, James L.
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Pacific World: Journal of the Institute of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.3 Third Series |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2001 |
|---|
| ページ | 199 - 217 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Institute of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.shin-ibs.edu/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Berkeley, CA, US [伯克利, 加利福尼亞州, 美國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | Special Issue on Contemporary Shin Buddhist Thought. |
|---|
| キーワード | 佛教人物=Buddhist; 法然=Honen; Pure Land=淨土; Sukhavati=極樂世界; Pure Land School=淨土宗; Japanese Buddhist history=日本佛教史; Amida Buddha=Amitabha Buddha=阿彌陀佛 |
|---|
| 抄録 | The paper examine the dabate in the early 13 century between Jokei (1555-1213) of the Hosso school and Honen (1133-1212)，founder of the Pure Land School in Japan. In many ways, the controversy epitomizes the fundamental doctrinal divide between the broader Buddhist tradition and particular regional forms that emerged in Japan，during and after the Kamakura period (1185-1333).
Reader and Tanabe emphasize the pluralistic character of contemporary Japanese religion. Almost all temples feature a variety of auspicious images offering different practical and religious benefits, and this plurality is true of Pure Land temples as well. It is in this pluralistic respect，at least，that contemporary Japanese religion is so fundamentally confluent with pre-modem Japanese religion. Some Pure Land proponents lament that their tradition has lost the truly radical nature of Honen and Shinran's vision. What these scholars see as lost，namely the radically exclusive claims of Honen and Shinran，are the very elements that differentiated them so much from established figures like Jokei. |
|---|
| ISSN | 08973644 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 477 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2007.10.22 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.02.03 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
