|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Suttas on Sakka and why the Shorter Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama should not be attributed to the Kāsyapīya school |
|
|
|
著者 |
Bingenheimer, Marcus
|
掲載誌 |
Buddhist Studies Review
|
巻号 | v.26 n.2 |
出版年月日 | 2009 |
ページ | 127 - 153 |
出版者 | Equinox Publishing Ltd. |
出版サイト |
https://www.equinoxpub.com/home/
|
出版地 | Sheffield, UK [謝菲爾德, 英國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
抄録 | This article is part of a series on the Shorter Chinese Saṃyukta-āgama (BZA). Continuing the investigation from previous research on the provenance of the BZA, it is concluded that the attribution of the BZA to the Kā?yapīya school is mistaken. A comparison of the BZA’s ?akra-saṃyukta with the Pāli Sakka-saṃyutta shows that, with minor exceptions, the narrative content of both saṃyuttas is identical though the number of suttas varies. Finally, the article completes the translation of the ?akra-saṃyukta, the first part of which appeared in BSR 25 (2). |
ISSN | 02652897 (P); 17479681 (E) |
DOI | 10.1558/bsrv.v26i2.127 |
ヒット数 | 1075 |
作成日 | 2010.02.03 |
更新日期 | 2017.07.05 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|