 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
緣起不能破 -- 宗喀巴對中觀緣起學說的肯定=Dependent Arising Cannot be Refuted: Tsongkhapa's Affirmation of the Madhyamika View on Dependent Arising |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
王堯 (著)=Wang, Yau (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
中華佛學學報=Chung-Hwa Buddhist Journal=Journal of Chinese Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.5 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 1992.07 |
|---|
| ページ | 49 - 66 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 中華佛學研究所=Chung-Hwa Institute of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.chibs.edu.tw/publication_tw.php?id=12
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 新北市, 臺灣 [New Taipei City, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese; 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | 宗喀巴; 中觀; 緣起說; 應成派; 自續派; 龍樹=龍樹=Nagarjuna=kLu-sgrub; 空性; 中道; 離邊中觀論; 二諦 |
|---|
| 抄録 | 宗喀巴獨特思想的出發點和歸結點是他對中觀緣起學說
的肯定. 他將「名言無自性」規定為應成派區別於自續派的
特徵，從而同常見劃清了界線，他又在「破與立」的問題上
堅持「自宗應有許」的主張，從而同斷見劃清了界線. 他的
上述這兩方面的看法，是以他對「緣起」學說的理解為基礎
的. 實際上，「緣起」思想正包含著上述兩個方面的意義.
我們先就這個問題，即在龍樹等印度論師的筆下「緣起」二
字所包含的意義作討論，然後再研究宗喀巴是如何看待它的
.
The point from which Tsongkhapa developed his
extraordinary thoughts and in which it culminated is
his affirmation of the `Madhyamika` view on
dependent arising. He ruled "imputation and
emptiness of inherent existence" as the
characteristic which differentitates `Prasangika`
from `Svatantrika` thus drawing a demarcation line
to the view of permanence. Furthermore，as to the
question of refuting and asserting tenets, he held
the opinion that "his own school asserts
(conventional) existence by consequence "whereby he
drew a demarcation line to the view of annihilation.
Both these ideas were based on his understanding of
the theory of dependent arising and，as matter of
fact，it is exactly these two concepts which
"dependent arising" encompasses.
We first translate what `Nagarjuna` and other
Indian pundits had to say about the meaning of the
term "dependent arising"，and then investigate how
Tsongkhapa viewed it. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10177132 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 1302 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 1998.07.22
|
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.06.15 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
