 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
道信與神秀之禪法的比較 -- 兼論惠能所批評之看心, 看淨的禪法=Shen Hsiu's and Tao Hsin's Way of Zen：A Comparison |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
楊惠南 =楊惠男
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
國立臺灣大學哲學論評=National Taiwan University Philosophical Review
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.11 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 1988.01 |
|---|
| ページ | 205 - 225 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 國立臺灣大學哲學系=NTU Philosophy Department |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://review.philo.ntu.edu.tw/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 臺北市, 臺灣 [Taipei shih, Taiwan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| キーワード | 道信; 神秀; 禪宗=Zen Buddhism=Zazen Buddhism; 惠能; 看心; 看淨; 一行三昧; 六祖壇經=The Sixth Patriarch's Sutra |
|---|
| 抄録 | According to the tradition of the Zen Buddhistic school，the sudden method of Hui Neng follows the
orthodox teachings of Hung Jen and Tao Hsin，while the gradual method of Shen Hsiu is a heresy. The
present paper，based on a comparative study of Shen Hsiu's and Tao Hsin's way of Zen，shows that the
method of "looking at mind，looking at purity" critized by Hui Neng，is espoused not only by Shen
Hsiu but also by Tao Hsin.
Both Tao Hsin and Shen Hsiu adhere to the Zen of the Lankavatara Sutra advocated by the earlier Zen
masters from Bodhidharma on，but in Hui Neng and the later masters, we find that many ideas derived from
the Diamond Sutra are introduced into the way of Zen. This is the reason why Hui Neng takes exception
to Tao Hsin's and Shen Hsiu's "Lankavatara Zen". Therefore，the distinction between "orthodoxy" and
"heresy" in Zen school is not merely a matter of who holds fast to the original teachings of Bodhidharma,
there are other factors to be considered.
|
|---|
| 目次 | 一. 序論
二. 慧能批判了什麼禪法
三. 神秀之禪法的特色
四. 神秀與道信之禪法的比較
五. 結論 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10158995 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 1707 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2000.10.11
|
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.08.18 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
