|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yogacara Buddhism and Sartre's Phenomenology=唯識哲學與沙特之現象學 |
|
|
|
著者 |
Chan, Wing-cheuk =陳榮灼
|
掲載誌 |
玄奘佛學研究=Hsuan Chuang Journal of Buddhism Studies
|
巻号 | n.3 |
出版年月日 | 2005.07.01 |
ページ | 127 - 144 |
出版者 | 玄奘大學 |
出版サイト |
http://ird.hcu.edu.tw/front/bin/home.phtml
|
出版地 | 新竹市, 臺灣 [Hsinchu shih, Taiwan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
ノート | 作者為加拿大布洛克大學教授=Associate Professor, Humanities Research Institute of Brock University |
抄録 | The problem of whether Yogacara Buddhism is idealistic has become a focal topic in Western scholarship. An idealistic interpretation of Yogacara Buddhism usually finds its justification in the famous slogan of the Samdhinirmocana sutra that “the object of consciousness is the manifestation of consciousness only.” In fact, many Indian scholars simply translate “vijnaptimatrata” or “vijnanavada” as “idealism.” For example, A. K. Chatterjee’s work on Yogacara Buddhism was entitled The Yogacara Idealism. Even nowadays, in Japan such an idealistic understanding of Yogacara is still dominant. On the other hand, Yoshifumi Ueda proclaims a non-idealistic interpretation of Yogacara Buddhism. Besides, Lambert Schmithausen and Alex Wayman have argued for the thesis that the early Yogacra Buddhism is not idealistic. This line has been followed by Dan Lusthaus. In this paper, in terms of a comparison with Sartre’s phenomenology, we will clarify Ueda’s basic position. This will not only phenomenologically justify Ueda’s critique of Dharmapala’s doctrine of internal objects, but also indicate how Yogacara Buddhism can help Sartre to overcome the dualist predicament.
「唯識哲學是否觀念論」一問題己成為西方學界的研究焦點。長期以來由於法相宗之影响,主流意見均主張唯識哲學為一觀念論。但是經過上田義文和Lambert Schmithausen 等人之努力,對于唯識哲學之「非觀念論解釋」亦漸引起不少學者之興趣。本文嘗試透過與沙特之現象學之比較,來釐清上田義文對唯識哲學之「非觀念論解釋」的基本立場。這不但從現象學之角度來証成上田反對護法「內境說」之合理性,同時指出以唯識哲學修正沙特之現象學之二元論困難的可能性。 |
ISSN | 18133649 (P) |
ヒット数 | 670 |
作成日 | 2010.09.10 |
更新日期 | 2017.12.01 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|