|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Existence of Factors in the Three Time Periods: Sarvāstivāda and Madhyamaka Buddhist Interpretations of Difference in Mode, Difference in Characteristic Marks, Difference in State, and Mutual Difference |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Dessein, Bart (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.60 n.3 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2007.09 |
|---|
| ページ | 331 - 350 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Akademiai Kiado Rt. |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.akademiai.com
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Budapest, Hungary [布達佩斯, 匈牙利] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | Indian Buddhism; Chinese Buddhism; Sarvāstivāda; Vaibhā?ika; Madhyamaka; Sanlun; Jizang |
|---|
| 抄録 | This article focusses on discussing the reason of existence of factors(dharma) in the three time periods(trikāla) as it is recorded in the Vaibhā?ika * Abhidharmamahāvibhā?ā?āstra and in the Sarvāstivāda works that postdate this text. The origin of this discussion is traced back in the earliest Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma works. Also the Chinese Sanlun philosopher Jizang(549–623), in his “ Shi’er men lun shu ”, a commentary on Nāgārjuna’s * Dvāda?advāraka “ Shi’er men lun ”, raises this discussion. Here, references are made to the vibhā?ā literature. The treatment of the subject in the “ Shi’er men lun shu ” reveals:
(1) that the Chinese Sanlun (and Madhyamaka) philosophers were familiar with this discussion in Sarvāstivāda philosophy
(2) that they criticised the Sarvāstivāda viewpoint
(3) gives evidence for a rise of Indian Madhyamaka philosophy and a place of origin of Nāgārjuna in the North of the Indian subcontinent.
|
|---|
| ISSN | 00016446 (P); 15882667 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 524 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2011.03.11 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2023.08.04 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
