|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sātmaka, Nairātmya, and A-Nairātmya: Dharmakīrti's Counter-Argument Against the Proof of Ātman |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Kano, Kyo
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.39 n.4-5 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2011.10 |
|---|
| ページ | 391 - 410 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Springer |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | Author Affiliations: Kobe Women’s University, 2-1 Higashisuma-Aoyama, Suma-ku, Kobe, 654-8585, Japan |
|---|
| キーワード | Ātman; Prasaṅga; Kevalavyatirekin; Nairātmya; Paryudāsa; Contraposition; Dichotomy |
|---|
| 抄録 | Ātman (soul) and Nairātmya (no soul) are, for the Brahmanical schools and the Buddhists respectively, equally fundamental tenets which neither side can concede to the other. Among the 16 formulations presented by Uddyotakara, the fifteenth, which is a proof of Ātman and is originally an indirect proof (avīta/āvīta), is presented in a prasaṅga-style, and contains double negation (na nairātmyam) in the thesis. However, it is perhaps Dharmakīrti who first transformed it into a normal style (sātmakam). He is well aware of the law of excluded middle, and insisits that the negation is paryudāsa. On the Nyāya side, Uddyotakara at least seems to be unaware of the law of the logical equivalence of contraposition concerning pervasion (vyāpti). After Uddyotakara, however, Vyoman (Vyomaśiva), Bhāsarvajña and Vācaspatimiśra, all seem to be well aware of it. Dharmakīrti, in his conter-argument against the proof of ātman, discusses the negative expressions ‘‘nairātmya” and ‘‘a-nairātmya” Dharmakīrti here uses two logical arguments skillfully and tactically. As a critic of both the authenticity of the Veda and the existence of ātman, he insists on the theory of dichotomy and the equivalence of anvaya and vyatireka, whereas as an apologist he denies the application of these theories to the relation between the existence of ātman and the concept of nairātmya, because for him as a Buddhist the latter is not a negative but essentially positive state of affairs. |
|---|
| 目次 | A¯tman and Naira¯tmya 392
Kevalavyatirekin – The Fifteenth Formulation in Uddyotakara’s Wheel of Reasons 392
Dharmakı¯rti’s Counter-Argument Against the Proof of A¯ tman 397
Appendix 2: Formulations of the Proof of A¯ tman 405
Appendix 3: Tentative Translation (PVSV and PVV ad PV 1.291) 406
|
|---|
| ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 328 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2013.10.11 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2019.07.31 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
