|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
アヴァローキタヴラタの瑜伽行派批判についての一考察 : Madhyāntavibhāga 第I章第3偈の解釈をめぐって=Considering Avalokitavrata's Criticism of the Yogācāra School : About the Interpretation of the Third Verse of Chapter I of Madhyāntavibhāga |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
新作慶明 (著)=Niisaku, Yoahiaki (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
インド哲学仏教学研究=インド テツガク ブッキョウガク ケンキュウ=Studies of Indian Philosophy and Buddhism, Tokyo University
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.19 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2012.03 |
|---|
| ページ | 91 - 103 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 東京大学インド哲学仏教学研究室=Dpt. Of Indian Philosophy and Buddhist Studies, Tokyo University |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.l.u-tokyo.ac.jp/intetsu/index.html
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| 抄録 | The third verse of chapter I (I-3) of the Madhyāntavibhāgakārikā (MAV-K) is one of the most important verses for the Yogācāra school. However, since Vasubandhu’s Madhyāntavibhāgabhāṣya (MAVBh), which is a commentary on MAV-K, is simple, there are two expressions that are difficult to understand. One of the two expressions is arthasattvapratibhāsasyānākāratvāt, which explains that artha is non-existent. The other expression was discussed in my previous article(IBK 60-2, pp. 975–972.). In Sthiramati’s Madhyāntavibhāgaṭīkv, a subcommentary on MAV-K, ākāra is considered a subjective cognitive function. However, we cannot obtain a clear interpretation of MAVBh on the basis of this interpretation. In this paper, we analyze Avalokitavrata’s criticism of the Yogācāra school’s interpretation of MAVBh in the Prajñāpradīpaṭīkā, which is a commentary on the Prajñāpradīpa. On the basis of Avalokitavrata’s interpretation, we conclude that ākāra means “image” in MAVBh. |
|---|
| ISSN | 09197907 (P) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.15083/00036982 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 280 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2014.11.25 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.08.31 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
