|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Causation, ‘Humean' Causation and Emptiness |
|
|
|
著者 |
Siderits, Mark
|
掲載誌 |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
巻号 | v.42 n.4 |
出版年月日 | 2014.09 |
ページ | 433 - 449 |
出版者 | Springer |
出版サイト |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
ノート | M. Siderits (&) Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea e-mail: msideri@ilstu.edu |
キーワード | Causation; Emptiness; Madhyamaka; Humean; Intrinsic nature |
抄録 | One strategy Mādhyamikas use to support their claim that nothing has intrinsic nature (svabhāva) is to argue that things with intrinsic nature could not enter into causal relations. But it is not clear that there is a good Madhyamaka argument against ultimate causation that understands causation in ‘Humean’ terms and understands dharmas as tropes. After exploring the rationale behind the intrinsic-nature criterion of dharma-hood, I survey the arguments Mādhyamikas actually give for their claim that anything dependently originated must be devoid of intrinsic nature, and suggest that none actually succeeds in ruling out this hypothesis about how ultimate causation might work. |
目次 | Sources of the svabhāva Criterion Vaibhāṣika Eternalism and Vasubandhu’s Presentist Response Madhyamaka Arguments Against Causation at the Ultimate Level Abbreviations and References |
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
ヒット数 | 335 |
作成日 | 2014.12.31 |
更新日期 | 2019.07.29 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|