|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dzong-ka-ba on Chandrakirti's Assertion of “non-dependence on another” as the Object to be Negated in the View of Emptiness |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Magee, William
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Canadian Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.4 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2008 |
|---|
| ページ | 29 - 53 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Nalanda College of Buddhist Studies |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cjbs
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Toronto, Canada [多倫多, 加拿大] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| 抄録 | Geluk presentations of Madhyamika contend that innate ignorance erroneously superimposes a certain look and feel onto reality. This illusory impression is called “the object to be negated” (dgag bya,pratiSedya) and, in the Prasangika-Madhyamika School, “inherent existence” or “own- being” (rangbzhin, svabhava). This article examines both Candrakirti's (6th–7th C.E.) identification of the object to be negated—“non-dependence on another”—and Dzong-ka-ba’s claim that this is the same as “established by way of own entity” (rang gi ngo bos grub pa). Also discussed are six separate definitions of “dependence” allowed in Dzong-ka-ba’s Geluk system. Finally, in an appendix following the body of this work, I present my translation of an annotation from Nga-wang-bel-den’s Annotations for (Jamyang- shay-ba’s) “Great Exposition of Tenets,” which addresses these issues. |
|---|
| 目次 | Abstract 29
Introduction 29
Part One: Non-Dependence According to Ngawang-Bel-Den 30
1.1 Qualm One 31
1.2 Qualm Two 32
1.3 Qualm Three 34
1.4 Qualm Four 35
Part Two: Non-Dependence for CandrakƯrti and Dzong-ka-ba 36
Concluding Remarks 42
Appendix: Nga-wang-bel-den's Annotation ta —Delineation of the Object of Negation, A Self of Phenomena 43
Bibliography 47
Works by Modern Authors 48
|
|---|
| ISSN | 1710825X (P); 17108268 (E) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 411 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2015.05.05 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2017.07.19 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
