|
|
|
当書目の情報提供者は 李玉珉老師 です
|
|
|
|
莫高窟第244窟于闐太子題記再審查=Further investigation to the inscription of Khotanese princes on the wall-painting at Cave 244 Mogao Grottoes |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
梅林
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.2 (總號=n.114) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2009.04 |
|---|
| ページ | 4 - 7 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.dha.ac.cn/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| キーワード | 于闐; 從德太子; 德從; 尉遲輸羅 |
|---|
| 抄録 | 莫高窟第244窟于闐太子題記發現于上個世紀80年代,是研究五代宋初于闐王統非常重要的學術新材料。然而,由于殘缺帶來的釋讀差異,此處題記的學術價值并未真正顯露出來。本文在重新確認題記文字的基礎上,就繼李圣天之后為王的尉遲輸羅(966-977)其人身份另辟新說。
The inscription of Khotanese princes written on the wall of Cave 244 Mogao Grottoes had known to the academic circle in 1980s and it was instantly become the important referent material for the study of the genealogical table of the imperial family of Khotan Kingdom in the Five Dynasties and the early period of the Song Dynasty. It is a pity that blurred out painting itself had caused much indistinguishable ant thus there are some differences in interpretations to this inscription by scholars and further on produce less academic value to tell. Based on re-investigation on-situ the writings on the wall and identify with certainty the correct recognition, this article put towards a new opinion that Vis’ a’S’ūra (966-977) as well known who succeed to the throne after Vis’ a’ Sambhava must be someone else by a careful study of this piece of Dunhuang mural with the inscription written on as a whole. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
|---|
| 研究年代 | 宋代 |
|---|
| 研究地域 | 甘肅(敦煌莫高窟) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 287 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2016.05.12 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2018.04.24 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
