|
|
|
当書目の情報提供者は 李玉珉老師 です
|
|
|
|
敦煌石窟覆斗頂窟的考古學觀察〈上〉──覆斗頂並非模仿斗帳=Archaeological Research of the Truncated Pyramidal Ceiling of Dunhuang Caves (Ⅰ) :The Truncated Pyramidal Ceiling is not an Imitation of Hanging Curtains |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
戴春陽
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.2 (總號=n.138) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2013.04 |
|---|
| ページ | 10 - 27 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.dha.ac.cn/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| キーワード | 覆斗頂; 斗帳; 覆斗頂非模仿斗帳 |
|---|
| 抄録 | 敦煌石窟中覆斗頂窟是唯一貫穿敦煌石窟營建始終且數量最多的石窟形制。有學者據《釋名》"形如覆斗"的相關記載及有關考古資料提出"覆斗頂窟模仿斗帳"說。本文認為以現代考古學中"覆斗"一詞定義對應《釋名》中"覆斗"釋讀有誤。首先,該詞"覆"乃覆蓋而非倒置;其次漢代沒有口大底小之斗。各類文物資料表明古代不惟斗帳,凡帷帳均無"覆斗頂",因而"覆斗頂窟模仿斗帳"說不能成立。此外,本文對該說所涉具體問題亦作解析。
The truncated pyramidal ceiling is the only kind of cave architecture that was adopted through the construction history of Dunhuang caves and accounts for the majority.Some scholars have put forward the opinion that this form imitated the tent ceiling according to the records of "like an inverted dou" in Shiming(Explanations of Appellations).This paper makes the case that it is not right to connect the definition of "truncated pyramid ceiling" in modern archaeology with the explanation of "inverted dou" in Explanations of Appellations.First,the word "fu" means "covering" instead of "being inverted;" second,there was no such dou with a small bottom and a broad top in the Han dynasty.All kinds of cultural relics as well as relevant information suggests that neither the bed curtains nor any hanging curtain had the top like the "inverted top",so the above-mentioned opinion is no longer tenable.This paper also deals with the exact problems about the opinion. |
|---|
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
|---|
| 研究種類 | 石窟 |
|---|
| 研究年代 | 南北朝 |
|---|
| 研究地域 | 甘肅(敦煌莫高窟,天水麥積山石窟) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 314 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2016.05.12 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2018.05.21 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
