|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early Meanings of Dependent-Origination |
|
|
|
著者 |
Shulman, Eviatar (著)
|
掲載誌 |
Journal of Indian Philosophy
|
巻号 | v.36 n.2 |
出版年月日 | 2008.04 |
ページ | 297 - 317 |
出版者 | Springer |
出版サイト |
http://www.springer.com/gp/
|
出版地 | Berlin, Germany [柏林, 德國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 英文=English |
ノート | Author Affiliations: Faculty of Humanities, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; Hebrew University of Jerusalem Jerusalem, Israel |
キーワード | Dependent-origination; pratītya-samutpāda; paṭiccasamuppāda; Early Buddhism; Conditionality; Causality |
抄録 | Dependent-origination, possibly the most fundamental Buddhist philosophical principle, is generally understood as a description of all that exists. Mental as well as physical phenomena are believed to come into being only in relation to, and conditioned by, other phenomena. This paper argues that such an understanding of pratītya-samutpāda is mistaken with regard to the earlier meanings of the concept. Rather than relating to all that exists, dependent-origination related originally only to processes of mental conditioning. It was an analysis of the self, not of reality, embedded in the Upaniṣadic search for the ātman. The teaching also possessed important ontological implications regarding the nature of the relation between consciousness and reality. These implications suggest that rather than things being conditioned by other things, they are actually conditioned by consciousness. |
目次 | Questions of Authenticity 300 The 12 Links 302 The Middle Path 310 Dependent-Origination Contextualized 312 Conclusions 315 |
ISSN | 00221791 (P); 15730395 (E) |
DOI | 10.1007/s10781-007-9030-8 |
ヒット数 | 180 |
作成日 | 2019.10.08 |
更新日期 | 2023.10.20 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|