|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
《張淮深墓志銘》與張淮深被害事件再探=Restudying Zhang Huishen’s Epitaph and the Method of His Murder |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
楊寶玉 (著)=Yang, Bao-yu (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
敦煌研究=Dunhuang Research
|
|---|
| 巻号 | n.2 (總號=n.162) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2017 |
|---|
| ページ | 64 - 69 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 敦煌研究編輯部 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.dha.ac.cn/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 蘭州, 中國 [Lanzhou, China] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 中文=Chinese |
|---|
| ノート | 作者單位：中國社會科學院歷史研究所 |
|---|
| キーワード | 張淮深=Zhang Huaishen; 張球=Zhang Qiu; 索勛=Suo Xun; 敦煌=Dunhuang; 歸義軍=Gui-yi-jun |
|---|
| 抄録 | 本文主要根據法藏敦煌文書P.2913V《張淮深墓志銘》及從非常著名的《張淮深碑》抄件(S.6161A+S.3329+S.141564+S.6161B+S.6973+P.2762)卷背詩文中新找到的相關記述,對這些文書及其折射的歸義軍史諸問題進行了辨析考證。指出:《張淮深墓志銘》為葬后補寫,當撰于索勛當政期間,即景福二年至乾寧元年(893—894),略晚于同是張球所撰作的《索勛紀德碑》;通過對上述文書及當時敦煌史事的分析可知,索勛掌權后曾有過遷改葬張淮深及其諸子以安撫張淮深舊屬等舉動,表明在張氏家族的內訌爭斗中索勛的態度相對和緩,不像張淮鼎、張議潮十四女及李氏諸子那樣激烈;與張淮深同時遇害的主要就是其與陳氏夫人所生六子,并無陳氏本人,張淮深其余兒子則因非陳氏所生而沒有死于此難,推測張淮深當與諸嫡子政見一致,而諸庶子在此次血腥政變中的地位與作用特殊;張球撰作上述文書時非常用心,遣詞用字均仔細斟酌考慮,透過其于字里行間的隱晦表述,我們既可以索解出部分研究線索,又可以感受到張球與張淮深感情之深厚與行文之老到。
This paper presents a textual study on P.2913, Zhang Huaishen’s Epitaph, collected in France and the related records on the back of the manuscripts Stele Inscription about Zhang Huaishen’s Construction of Caves and Related Commentary, both of which cast light on the history of the Gui-yi-jun regime. This research shows that Zhang Huaishen’s epitaph was added after his burial and might have been written in the period when Suo Xun was in power, namely from the second year of the Jingfu era to the first year of the Ganning era(892—894), a little later than the creation of the Stele Recording of Suo Xun’s Merits, written by the same author, Zhang Qiu. By analyzing the above-mentioned manuscripts and the historical circumstances of Dunhuang at that time, it is known that Suo Xun had reburied Zhang Huaishen and his sons after coming into power in order to appease the former followers of Zhuang Huaishen, indicating that Suo Xun was relatively moderate in resolving the internal strife of the Zhang Family, unlike Zhang Huaiding, the fourteenth daughter of Zhang Yichao, and the sons of the Li Family further noted in relevant texts. Those who were killed in one mentioned purge include the six sons born by Zhang Haishen’s legal wife, Lady Chen, though not including Lady Chen herself. Zhang Huaishen’s other sons were not killed because Lady Chen was not their birth mother. From this it can be inferred that Zhang Huaishen likely shared the same political views as his sons born by his legal wife, and that his other sons played a special role in this bloody coup. Zhang Qiu was very careful with the wording of these inscriptions and epitaph and from his somewhat oblique statements we can not only obtain some clues about the historical event, but even feel Zhang Qiu’s affection for Zhang Haishen through his excellent penmanship. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一 《張淮深墓誌銘》並非寫於銘主被害後不久之補論 65
二 張淮深的葬儀及其折射的敦煌政治形勢與《張淮深墓誌銘》撰作時間推論 66
三 “兼夫人穎（潁）川郡陳氏六子”逗斷不同新解與張氏內部矛盾推論 67
四 張球與張淮深一家的情誼及張球行文意圖略析 68 |
|---|
| ISSN | 10004106 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 466 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2020.10.13 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2020.10.27 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
