|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variations in the Contemplation of the Repulsiveness of Food, āhārepatikūlasaññā: Canonical, Theravāda, Sarvāstivāda and Mahāyāna Forms |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Kong, Man-Shik
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Contemporary Buddhism: An Interdisciplinary Journal
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.20 n.1-2 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2019 |
|---|
| ページ | 95 - 110 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Routledge |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://www.routledge.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Abingdon, UK [阿賓登, 英國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| ノート | Author affiliation: College of Buddhist Studies, Dongguk University, Seoul, South Korea |
|---|
| 抄録 | This article explores the changing treatment of a meditation practice, the contemplation of the repulsiveness of food, āhārepaṭikūlasaññā, from its presence in lists of saññā in canonical texts to its detailed explanation in post-canonical texts of the first millennium CE. We observe two main developments: the limitation in the benefits attributed to the practice within commentarial-period Theravada, and two entirely divergent branches in the way the practice is treated. In the Visuddhimagga of Theravada Buddhism, we see a somewhat practical approach that identifies the unpleasant aspects of the monk’s experience of seeking, eating, digesting and excreting food, and takes them as the focus of a 10-stage meditation practice. In the Sarvāstivāda texts, we see a conceptual aversion created by the association of specific food items with other items treated as impure within meditation practice. This articles explores all these divergences, drawing conclusions about what this says in terms of the understanding of food in these two branches. |
|---|
| ISSN | 14639947 (P); 14767953 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2019.1599568 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 112 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2021.02.21 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.02.24 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
