 |
|
|
|
|
|
一切衆生의 成佛에 대한 圓測의 입장=Wonchuk’s standpoint about the possibility of becoming the Buddha in every sentient being |
|
|
|
著者 |
丁永根 (著)=정영근 (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
巻号 | v.5 |
出版年月日 | 2002.12 |
ページ | 157 - 180 |
出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
出版サイト |
http://www.kabs.re.kr/
|
出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 韓文=Korean |
キーワード | 원측; 규기; 법상유식; 오성각별론; 일체개성론; 일체중생실유불성; 방편 |
抄録 | Resently a new article is presented by a Japanese Kitskawa Tomoaki(橘川智昭) which insists that Wonchuk(圓測)'s view is completely equal to Fa-Xiang School(法相宗)’s theory of five distinct human natures(五性各別說). His argument is oposite undoubtedly to the already established understanding about Wonchuk's thought. In this paper the author tries to investigate this argument and clarify Wonchuk's standpoint about the possibility of becoming the Buddha in every sentient being. At first I made clear that his two starting points have no solid foundation. Then I reinvestigate his analysis about the sentenses in which two oposite opinions are referred. In this place I confirmed that Wonchuk is interpreting two opinions impatially. He makes an effort to explain the context and the function of each opinion. He does not insist absolutely that the one is correct and the other is false. Wonchuk shows deeper interest to sentient beings and has an exceedingly hopeful viewpoint that all sentient beings have many infinitive possibilities. This attitude is consistent in all his books. In conclusion I can say that Wonchuk does not agree in any sense with Fa-Xiang School's theory of five distinct human natures. |
目次 | I. 들어가는 말 159 II. 반론의 단초에 대한 검토 161 1. 혜소의 『成唯識論了義燈』에 언급이 없다는 점 161 2. 『유가론기』에 인용된 원측설과의 모순문제 162 III. 원측이 오성각별론자라는 논증에 대한 검토 166 1. 『解深密經疏』의 원문에 대한 내용분석 166 2. 논의의 구조에 대한 분석 167 3. 實說一乘假說三乘과 實說三乘假說一乘의 문제 170 IV. 모든 중생의 성불에 대한 원측의 입장 174 V. 맺는 말 178
|
ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
ヒット数 | 272 |
作成日 | 2021.03.26 |
更新日期 | 2021.03.26 |

|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|