 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
원효 저 『판비량론』의 대승불설 논증：勝軍의 대승불설 논증에 대한 玄奘의 비판과 元曉의 改作=Some syllogisms proving Mahāyāna’s orthodoxy in Won-Hyo’s Pan-Bi-Ryang-Ron: Hsüan-Tsang’s critique and Won-Hyo’s recomposition of Jayasena’s sylloginm |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
김성철 (著)=Kim, Sung-chul (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
불교학연구=Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.6 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2003.06 |
|---|
| ページ | 7 - 32 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 불교학연구회=佛教學研究會 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.kabs.re.kr/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Daegu, South Korea [大邱, 韓國] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 韓文=Korean |
|---|
| キーワード | 원효=Won-Hyo; 판비량론=Pan-Bi-Ryang-Ron; 현장=Hsüan-Tsang; 대승=Mahāyāna; 불설=-Buddhavacana; 승군= Jayasena; 논증식=syllogism; 부정인=anaikāntika; 증일아함경=Aṅguttara-Āgama; 발지론=Abhidharma -jñānaprasthāna-śāstra |
|---|
| 抄録 | There have been many efforts of proving Mahāyāna's orthodoxy throughout the history of Mahāyāna Buddhism. In Mahāyānasaṃ- grahavṛtti(攝大乘論釋) of Asvabhāva(無性), we can find some syllogi- stic expressions proving Mahāyāna's orthodoxy. But those express- ions fall in the fallacy of anaikāntika. So Jayasena(勝軍) who was the teacher of Hsüan-Tsang designed new syllogism proving Mahā- yāna's orthodoxy. That is as follows.
pratijñā: All the Mahāyāna scriptures are included in Buddha- vacana.
hetu: Because they are not included in 'non-Buddhavacana admi -tted by both parties'.
dṛṣṭānta: Like Aṅguttara-Āgama etc.
But his pupil Hsüan-Tsang pointed out the fallacy of anaikāntika in this syllogism by presenting the counter-example of Abhidharma -jñānaprasthāna-śāstra(發智論) and designed new syllogism as follows.
pratijñā: All the Mahāyāna scriptures are included in Buddhava- cana. hetu: Because they are not included in 'non-Buddhavacana admitted by this party'.
dṛṣṭānta: Like Aṅguttara-Āgama etc.
In Pan-Bi-Ryang-ron Won-Hyo criticized this syllogism. Won-Hyo also pointed out the fallacy of anaikāntika in this syllogism. To show this fallacy Won-Hyo took Rūpa(色) and Ghāna(香) etc. as the counter-examples.
Finally Won-Hyo made himself an syllogism proving Mahāyā- na's orthodoxy as follows.
pratijñā: The teachings of all the Mahāyāna scriptures are reaso- nable.
hetu: Because they are teachings not included in 'non-Buddha- vacana admitted by both parties'.
dṛṣṭānta: Like Aṅguttara-Āgama etc.
Here Won-Hyo means that the orthodoxy of Mahāyāna should be decided not by proving whether they are preached by Gautama Buddha himself or not, but by proving whether they are reasonable or not. So we can guess that Buddha conceived by Won-Hyo was not the Nirmāṇakāya but the Dharmakāya. |
|---|
| 目次 | I. 서론 7
II. 대승불설을 증면하는『攝大乘論釋』의 논증식과 勝軍比量 9
1. 『攝大乘論釋』의 논증식에서 발생하는 논리적 오류 9
2. 勝軍이 새롭게 고안한 논증식 11
III. 勝軍比量에 대한 玄奘의 비판 14
IV. 玄奘이 개량한 논증식과 그에 대한 元曉의 비판 17
1. 玄奘이 개량한 ‘대승불설을 증면하는 논증식’의 본래 모습은 무엇일까? 17
2. 玄奘이 개량한 논증식에 대한 元曉의 비판 20
V. 勝軍比量을 개작한 元曉의 理證的 논중식 23
VI. 결론 25
VII. 첨부 - 대승불설 논증과 관계된 그 밖의 단편 26
|
|---|
| ISSN | 15980642 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 259 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2021.03.26 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.03.26 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
