|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
“If someone says in this connection” The usage of etthāha in Pāli commentarial literature |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Kieffer-Pulz, Petra (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
創価大学国際仏教学高等研究所年報=Annual Report of the International Research Institute for Advanced Buddhology at Soka University=ソウカ ダイガク コクサイ ブッキョウガク コウトウ ケンキュウジョ ネンポウ
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.22 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2019 |
|---|
| ページ | 35 - 58 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 創価大学・国際仏教学高等研究所 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://iriab.soka.ac.jp/publication/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 八王子, 日本 [Hachioji, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | etthāha; kiñ c‘ ettha; vuccate; Pāli literature; commentaries; objections; replies; scholastic Pāli |
|---|
| 抄録 | In Pāli commentarial literature—as in Sanskrit commentaries—the meaning of canonical texts
is often explained in a dialogical structure of objections and replies. If an objection contains
two or more positions, a passage pointing out their consequences may be inserted between the
objection and the reply. To mark these three different sections, commentators introduced
specific words or phrases, among them etthāha to introduce an objection, kiñ c’ ettha to open
the explication of the consequences of the positions given in an objection, and vuccate to
indicate the reply. All three are syntactically detached from the subsequent sentences. |
|---|
| 目次 | Objection (etthāha) 35
Corpus 37
Analysis of the occurrences 37
Discussion of Consequences (kiñ c’ ettha) 43
Reply (vuccate) 44
Conclusions 45
|
|---|
| ISSN | 13438980 (P) |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 286 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2021.11.19 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2021.11.24 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
