|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ウダヤナの言及する「ジャヤンタ」について=On “Jayanta” as Referred to by Udayana |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
室屋安孝 (著)=むろややすたか (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.65 n.1 (總號=n.140) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2016.12.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 261 - 255 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| ノート | （オーストリア学術研究助成基金 FWF P27863 による研究成果の一部）
オーストリア科学アカデミーアジア文化・思想史研究所研究員，博士（文学） |
|---|
| キーワード | upamāna; Udayana; Bhaṭṭa Jayanta; Vācaspati Miśra; Vardhamāna |
|---|
| 抄録 | In his exposition of Nyāyasūtra 1.1.6, which defines analogy or identification (upamāna), Udayana (ca. 11th century CE) made an important statement that has been considered as symbolically indicating a turning point in the history of the Nyāya tradition. According to Udayana, Vācaspati Miśra (ca. 10th c.) refers to the “refutation of the Old Naiyāyika, Jayanta and others (jarannaiyāyika-jayanta-prabhṛti-).” This statement has long been considered by scholars as a witness of Bhaṭṭa Jayanta’s (ca. 9th c.) chronological antecedence to Vācaspati. However, the statement has not received sufficient philological examination by offering an analysis of relevant passages that positively substantiate Udayana’s witness. Furthermore, Udayana calls Vācaspati the “modern Naiyāyika” (abhinavanaiyāyika), with the emphasis on Vācaspati’s novelty. The present paper aims at giving these views by Udayana a certain level of plausibility by examining relevant passages from Vācaspati’s Nyāyavārttikatātparyaṭīkā and Jayanta’s Nyāyamañjarī. The analysis also relies on a passage from an as yet unpublished portion of Vardhamāna’s (ca. 14th c.) Nyāyanibandhaprakāśa, a commentary on Udayana’s Nyāyavārttikatātparyapariśuddhi. In addition to detecting theories of Jayanta to which Vācaspati allegedly refers, the paper describes an innovative aspect of Vācaspati’s own theory of analogy, which will, in effect, mark the theory presented by Jayanta as theoretically cumbersome (gaurava). |
|---|
| 目次 | 0. 261
1. 261
2. 259
2.1. 259
2.2. 258
2.3. 258
3. 257
4. 256
［謝辞］ 256
〈略号〉 255
〈参考文献〉 255 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.4259/ibk.65.1_261 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 182 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.04.27 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
