 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sophistry In and As Its Course |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
Liberman, Kenneth (著)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
Argumentation
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.22 n.1 |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2008 |
|---|
| ページ | 59 - 70 |
|---|
| 出版者 | Springer |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
https://link.springer.com/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | Dordrecht, the Netherlands [多德雷赫特, 荷蘭] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 英文=English |
|---|
| キーワード | Tibetan debating; Ethnomethodology; Sophistry; Philosophy |
|---|
| 抄録 | Although sophistry has been characterized as separable from real philosophy, formal analysis does not work without it and one cannot always identify just where philosophy leaves off and sophistry begins. Whether sophistry offers anything to thinking reason has to do with what parties in dialogue do with sophistries. Sophistries can close down or open up philosophical perspectives, depending on the local work that sophistic strategies accomplish. Such local work of philosophers is rarely available to analyses of docile texts, but they can be furthered by ethnomethodological studies of illustrative philosophical argumentation presented and analyzed in videotaped format. |
|---|
| ISSN | 0920427X (P); 15728374 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10503-007-9070-y |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 170 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.05.10 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.05.10 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
