|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
チャンドラーナンダとバーヴィヴェーカの年代に関する考察 ――「二指」説をめぐって――=On the Dates of Candrānanda and Bhāviveka: The “Two-Finger” Illustration |
|
|
|
著者 |
何歓歓 (著)=かかんかん (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
巻号 | v.65 n.2 (總號=n.141) |
出版年月日 | 2017.03.20 |
ページ | 775 - 769 |
出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 日文=Japanese |
ノート | 浙江大学教授,日本学術振興会外国人特別研究員 |
キーワード | バーヴィヴェーカ; チャンドラーナンダ; ヴァイシェーシカ学派; 二指(dvyaṅgula) |
抄録 | This essay offers an analysis of what I will call the “two-finger” illustration, which Bhāviveka discusses in the Vaiśeṣikatattvaviniścaya chapter of the Tarkajvālā, the auto-commentary on his Madhyamakahṛdaya[kārikā], wherein he introduces and criticizes the theories of the Vaiśeṣika school. Going through the early Vaiśeṣika literature, I noticed that these two-finger (dvyaṅgula, two fingers in a unit form, or finger-pair) illustrations only occur in Candrānanda’s Vṛtti, and that they do so in a very clear and straightforward manner. As I will point out, what is a mystery, and what is indeed somewhat perplexing, is the fact that the references to this illustration in the Tarkajvālā are not at all immediately intelligible. This circumstance will be addressed in this essay, in which I will also offer an interpretation and propose a solution to the issue at hand. In addition, the relative chronology of Bhāviveka and Candrānanda, as well as their contemporaries around the sixth century India, will also be discussed. |
目次 | 1.はじめに――問題の所在―― 775 2.バーヴィヴェーカが紹介する「二指」説 775 3.バーヴィヴェーカによる「二指」説批判 773 4.結語――チャンドラーナンダとバーヴィヴェーカの年代関係―― 771 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
DOI | 10.4259/ibk.65.2_775 |
ヒット数 | 147 |
作成日 | 2022.05.11 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|