 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
上座の顚倒説に対するサンガバドラの批判=Saṅghabhadra’s Criticism on the Sthavira Theory of Viparyāsa |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
箕浦暁雄 (著)=Minoura, Akio (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2018.03.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 582 - 588 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 説一切有部; 経量部; 『倶舎論』; 『順正理論』; 随眠; 見所断 |
|---|
| 抄録 | This paper considers how Saṅghabhadra criticizes the Sthavira theory of Viparyāsa in the *Nyāyānusāra. Among Sarvāstivāda texts from the *Mahāvibhāṣā to the *Nyāyānusāra, only dṛṣṭiviparyāsa is accepted. The school accepts neither saṃjñāviparyāsa nor cittaviparyāsa. But the Sthavira states that both saṃjñāviparyāsa and cittaviparyāsa arise from ayoniśomanasikāra. Futhermore, the Sthavira explains that both viparyāsas arise in one who has entered the stream which leads to nirvāna (srota-āpanna). Therefore Saṅghabhadra as a Sarvāstivādin criticizes the Sthavira position for improper interpretation of the sūtras’ words. This paper shows the different interpretations found in Saṅghabhadra and Sthavira, and points out the problems that we must be aware of while discussing the viewpoint of Saṅghabhadra. |
|---|
| 目次 | 一 はじめに 582
二 顚倒成立の三条件をめぐる上座批判 583
三 十二顚倒に関する見所断論をめぐる上座批判 584
四 結び 586 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_582 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 196 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.08.02 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.02 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
