|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
非認識論証因における否定対象と認識対象について=Negative Object and Cognitive Object in the Reason of Non-cognition |
|
|
|
| 著者 |
道元大成 (著)=Michimoto, Daisei (au.)
|
|---|
| 掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
|---|
| 巻号 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
|---|
| 出版年月日 | 2018.03.20 |
|---|
| ページ | 788 - 785 |
|---|
| 出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
|---|
| 出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
|---|
| 出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
|---|
| 資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
|---|
| 言語 | 日文=Japanese |
|---|
| キーワード | 非認識論証因; アルチャタ; asaṃsṛṣṭa |
|---|
| 抄録 | In the Hetubindu, Dharmakīrti defines the non-cognition of the pot which is a negative object as the cognition of the spot (pradeśa) which is another cognitive object in the passages of the reason of non-cognition (anupalabdhihetu). Such a spot is qualified which has the nature of not being associated (asaṃsṛṣṭa), which is isolated (kevala) and which is another object (anya). This paper examines how Arcata interprets such qualifiers in the Hetubinduṭīkā.
Arcata interprets the spot which has the nature of not being associated with the pot as divided into the two cases that the spot is another and that it is isolated. In the former case, it indicates logical non-association. In the latter case, it indicates ontological non-association. |
|---|
| 目次 | 1. 問題の所在 788
2. 「壺と結合していない本体を有する」場所に対する二種の表現 788
3. 「別である」という表現について 787
4. 「単独である」という表現について 786
5. 結論 786 |
|---|
| ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_788 |
|---|
| ヒット数 | 69 |
|---|
| 作成日 | 2022.08.04 |
|---|
| 更新日期 | 2022.08.04 |
|---|
 |
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。ＩＥではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|
