|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CandrānandaとBhāvivekaの年代再考:「śabda推論」をめぐって=Once Again on the Dates of Candrānanda and Bhāviveka: The Inference of Śabda |
|
|
|
著者 |
何歓歓 (著)=He, Huan-huan (au.)
|
掲載誌 |
印度學佛教學研究 =Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies=Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyū
|
巻号 | v.66 n.2 (總號=n.144) |
出版年月日 | 2018.03.20 |
ページ | 808 - 802 |
出版者 | 日本印度学仏教学会 |
出版サイト |
http://www.jaibs.jp/
|
出版地 | 東京, 日本 [Tokyo, Japan] |
資料の種類 | 期刊論文=Journal Article |
言語 | 日文=Japanese |
キーワード | Bhāviveka; Candrānanda; Vaiśeṣika; śabda 推論 |
抄録 | Bhāviveka (ca. 490–ca. 570) refers to Vaiśeṣika thought some six times in his *Hastaratna, a work that is only available in the Chinese translation of Xuanzang 玄奘 (600/602–664) where it is titled the Dasheng zhangzhen lun 大乘掌珍論.Among these six references, three have to do with the issue of sound, i.e., śabda. The so-called Vaiśeṣika arguments of the impermanence of sound are identical and we notice with some surprise that these are not found in the pre-Bhāviveka Vaiśeṣika writings that are currently available. By examining those arguments of sound being impermanent in the *Hastaratna, and related texts in Chinese, Sanskrit and Tibetan, this essay firstly aims to offer some additional evidence for my previous conjecture on the relative chronology of Bhāviveka and Candrānanda. And, secondly, it also aims to explore the “tradition” that Bhāviveka had received from his Buddhist predecessors, such as Dignāga etc., as well as what differentiates him from them. The ultimate context in which these must be placed is of course the Madhyamaka proof of emptiness within the framework of two-truth theory. |
目次 | 1. Bhāviveka が紹介した Vaiśeṣika の「śabda 推論」 808 2. Vaiśeṣika に説かれた「śabda 推論」 807 3. Bhāviveka 以前の仏教徒が紹介した「śabda 推論」 805 4. 結語 803 |
ISSN | 00194344 (P); 18840051 (E) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4259/ibk.66.2_808 |
ヒット数 | 126 |
作成日 | 2022.08.04 |
更新日期 | 2022.08.04 |
|
Chrome, Firefox, Safari(Mac)での検索をお勧めします。IEではこの検索システムを表示できません。
|
|
|